For equal prior probabilities and independent and identically distributed observations on a finite alphabet, minimum sum of errors in a simple hypothesis test gives
For nonnegative and , . Applying this termwise and using the independence of random variables to factor the sum yields
Optimizing , with an infimum if needed, proves . This short argument gives a bound for every . The theorem identifying the optimal error exponent also needs the converse: no decision rule can achieve a strictly larger limiting exponent. A log-likelihood ratio is a sum of independent contributions, so large deviation principle supplies the relevant converse idea.

Articles by others on the same topic (NaN)

There are currently no matching articles.