Nonmonotonic magnetic bending 2026-10-05
For nonzero imposed surface inclination, magnetic bending in an incompressible disk is nonmonotonic when : the first maximum of occurs at , followed by a decrease. This is exactly the finite-thickness magnetorotational instability criterion for the same slab. The zero-inclination equilibrium can still be unstable, so nonmonotonic bending is a property of the forced profile, rather than a condition on every possible unstable equilibrium.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 57 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Set , so and . The vertical equation becomesFor , division by the common factor gives the Legendre differential equation with eigenvalue . Requiring boundedness at both surfaces selectsThe second independent solution is unbounded at an endpoint. These are the bounded vertical modes of a sech-squared magnetized disk. The division by is outside the square root, as in the original PDF; the converted TeX places it incorrectly. The magnetic perturbation involves , which tends to zero at either surface.
The constant function has . The specified magnetic ansatz contains and must not be applied to it. A uniform horizontal velocity with no magnetic perturbation is an epicyclic motion, not a growing magnetic mode; the zero-wavenumber formal degeneracy does not provide growing MRI at arbitrary field strength. Nontrivial magnetically coupled vertical modes have .
For , the magnetorotational instability grows when . Indeed, the quadratic in then has a negative constant term, and one positive root. For , the two roots are nonpositive, since their sum is negative, their product nonnegative, and their discriminant is . The smallest nonzero vertical eigenvalue is , so all vertical modes are stable ifThe strict inequality requested gives stability, and equality is marginal for . A sufficiently strong field increases magnetic tension. The unstable MRI needs a sufficiently long vertical wavelength to exchange angular momentum without excessive restoring tension; bounded vertical structure imposes a smallest nonzero effective wavenumber. Beyond the finite-thickness magnetorotational instability criterion, no allowed magnetic mode is long enough to remain unstable.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 321 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The horizontally invariant magnetized shearing-sheet equations are linear in the horizontal fields, so perturbations about the equilibrium satisfy the same equations. The fixed surface boundary conditions require at . Choose a normal mode withwhere the vertical wavenumber is , . With the Alfvén frequencythe four amplitude equations becomeEliminating the velocities leavesA nonzero amplitude requires the determinant of this system to vanish, yielding the ideal magnetorotational dispersion relationEquivalently, with ,As a quadratic equation for , its discriminant is . If , its constant term is negative, so one root is positive and there is an exponentially growing mode. If , both the constant term and the coefficient of are positive, giving two negative roots and only oscillatory modes. Equality is marginal.
The lowest allowed vertical wavenumber, , is the last to be stabilized as increases. Therefore the finite-thickness magnetorotational instability criterion isThere is also a vertically uniform velocity mode with zero magnetic perturbation; for the usual orbitally stable regime , it is just stable epicyclic motion. For , that uniform mode is already hydrodynamically unstable, independently of the magnetic criterion. At it is marginal. The criterion above concerns the magnetic modes.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 321 3 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Using , the finite-thickness magnetorotational instability criterion is preciselyFor the midplane-symmetric equilibrium with , the absolute radial magnetic field isIts first maximum occurs at . The instability condition puts strictly inside the disc: . The magnitude rises from zero to this maximum, then decreases on a nonempty interval before the surface. Thus the unstable equilibrium exhibits nonmonotonic magnetic bending, as illustrated below.
Monotonic and nonmonotonic magnetic bending
. The symmetric equilibrium profiles have . The weak-field example has an interior maximum and admits a growing magnetic mode. Details.The link between bending and instability concerns a nonzero imposed surface inclination. If , the unbent equilibrium can still have magnetorotational instability; the literal nonmonotonic-bending conclusion does not apply to that degenerate case. Resonances with also require the separate equilibrium analysis in part (b).
