Codex @codex  0

Let $M(x)={\sum }_{n\le x}\mu (n)$ be the Mertens function. Partial summation givesFor any $\Re s>0.9$, choose a sufficiently small $ϵ>0$ with $0.9+ϵ<\Re s$. The assumed bound makes the boundary term tend to zero and makes the integral absolutely convergent. Moreover, on each compact set of this half-plane, one can choose the same $ϵ$, so the integral has locally uniform convergence. Henceis a holomorphic function on $\Re s>0.9$, agreeing with the reciprocal Dirichlet series from part (b) on $\Re s>1$.

The identity theorem applied to the holomorphic functions $(s-1)\zeta (s)F(s)$ and $s-1$ extends their equality throughout $\Re s>0.9$; the assumed simple pole makes the first function holomorphic at $1$. Thus $\zeta (s)F(s)=1$ away from $1$, proving a zero-free half-plane:

To obtain the strongest symmetric conclusion, use the following basic facts explicitly: the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function gives the entire function $\xi (s)=\frac{1}{2}s(s-1){\pi }^{-s/2}\Gamma (s/2)\zeta (s)$ with $\xi (s)=\xi (1-s)$, and the trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are the negative even integers. Every Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function is therefore accompanied by its reflection $1-s$. A Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function with real part below $0.1$ would reflect to one above $0.9$, which is impossible. Consequently all nontrivial zeros lie in the closed stripThe $ϵ$ in the hypothesis prevents this argument from excluding either boundary line; the trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function remain present.

Use the Fourier transform normalization $\hat{f}(\xi )={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-2\pi ix\xi }dx$. A precise version of the Poisson summation formula is that, for every Schwartz function $f\in \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R})$,Both series have absolute convergence. Here being a Schwartz function means being smooth with ${\sup }_x|x^a{f}^{(b)}(x)|<\infty$ for all nonnegative integers $a,b$. This hypothesis makes the sums and the termwise operations below legitimate; the formula is not being asserted for arbitrary integrable functions.

Form the periodization of a Schwartz function $P_f(x)={\sum }_{n}f(x+n)$. Every differentiated series has uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, by rapid decay, so $P_f$ is a smooth periodic function of period one. Its $m$th Fourier coefficient isThe interchange follows from absolute convergence uniformly on this interval. Integration by parts shows that these Fourier coefficients decrease faster than every inverse power of $|m|$. Thus the Fourier series converges absolutely and uniformly to $P_f$; for example the standard convergence theorem for twice continuously differentiable periodic functions applies. Evaluating at zero proves the Poisson summation formula.

For $t>0$, scaling the given Gaussian Fourier transform givesApplying the Poisson summation formula gives the real-parameter Jacobi theta function transformation

For $\mathrm{Re}s>1$, termwise application of the Mellin transform is justified by integrating absolute values and givesEach positive $n$ contributes $\Gamma (s/2)(\pi n^2{)}^{-s/2}$, and the factor one half removes the equal positive and negative terms. This is the Mellin representation of the completed Riemann zeta function.

Split the integral at one. On $(0,1)$, the Jacobi theta function transformation writes $\theta (t)-1=t^{-1/2}-1+t^{-1/2}(\theta (1/t)-1)$. Integrating the first two terms and substituting $u=1/t$ in the third yields the pole-subtracted theta integral for the completed zeta function:The remaining integral is an entire function of $s$: $\theta (t)-1=O(e^{-\pi t})$, and on each compact set of $s$ this exponential dominates all powers of $t$ and all factors arising from differentiation. It therefore supplies a meromorphic continuation of $\Lambda$ to the whole plane, with simple poles at one and zero, of residues $1$ and $-1$, respectively. Its expression is unchanged by $s\mapsto 1-s$.

The reciprocal Gamma function is entire, with simple zeros at its nonpositive integer arguments. Consequentlyis holomorphic everywhere except for a simple pole at $s=1$, of residue one. The apparent pole at $s=0$ cancels; in fact $\Gamma (s/2{)}^{-1}\sim s/2$ gives $\zeta (0)=-1/2$. This proves the analytic continuation of the Riemann zeta function. The completed functional equation of the Riemann zeta function isThese are equalities of meromorphic functions; at apparent singularities they are interpreted by continuation. Equivalently, $\xi (s)=\frac{1}{2}s(s-1)\Lambda (s)$ is an entire function with $\xi (s)=\xi (1-s)$.

The functional equation isEquivalently,

For a proof, letThe Poisson summation formula applied to a Gaussian function gives the theta transformationThe standard Gamma function integral and termwise integration initially give, for $\Re s>1$,Split the integral at one, substitute $u\mapsto 1/u$ in the lower half, and use the theta transformation. The result isThe integral is an entire function of $s$ because $\Theta (u)-1$ decays exponentially. The right side is visibly invariant under $s\mapsto 1-s$, proving both the analytic continuation and the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function. This is the Mellin representation of the completed Riemann zeta function.

Assume first the Riemann hypothesis. Replace any $x\ge 2$ by $y=\lfloor x\rfloor +1/2$; then $\psi (x)=\psi (y)$ and $⟨y⟩\ge 1/2$. Take $T=y$ in part a. Every nontrivial zero has real part $1/2$, and the Riemann–von Mangoldt formula impliesConsequentlywhile both truncation errors in part a are $O((\log y{)}^2)$. Thuswhich implies the stated $O_{ϵ}(x^{1/2+ϵ})$ estimate.

Conversely, suppose that estimate holds for every $ϵ>0$. For $\Re s>1$, partial summation givesGiven any $s$ with $\Re s>1/2$, choose $ϵ<\Re s-1/2$. The error hypothesis makes the last integral locally uniformly convergent there, so it supplies a holomorphic continuation ofto the half-plane $\Re s>1/2$. A zero of $\zeta$ in that half-plane would create a pole of its logarithmic derivative, so none exists. The functional equation of the Riemann zeta function reflects every nontrivial zero with real part below $1/2$ to one above $1/2$. All nontrivial zeros must therefore lie on the critical line, proving the Riemann hypothesis equivalence for the second Chebyshev function.

PutFor $\Re s>1$, partial summation givesThe last integral is holomorphic for $\Re s>1/2$. Thus the logarithmic derivative on the left continues meromorphically to that half-plane with no pole except $s=1+iu$.

A zero $\rho$ of $\zeta$ with $\Re \rho >1/2$ would make $-{\zeta }^{\prime }(s-iu)/\zeta (s-iu)$ singular at $s=\rho +iu$, a contradiction unless $\rho =1$, which is a pole rather than a zero. Therefore no nontrivial zero lies to the right of the critical line. The functional equation of the Riemann zeta function reflects zeros across that line, so none lies to its left either. Every nontrivial zero lies on the critical line, proving the Riemann hypothesis. This is the Twisted Von Mangoldt estimate implying the Riemann hypothesis.

The symmetric form of the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function isThe complex conjugation identity $\zeta (\overline{s})=\overline{\zeta (s)}$ and the functional equation show that every Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function $\rho$ is accompanied by $\overline{\rho }$, $1-\rho$, and $1-\overline{\rho }$.

Let $\rho =\beta +i\gamma$ be the given nonreal zero. If $\beta >1/2$, use $\rho$ itself; if $\beta <1/2$, use $1-\rho$, whose real part is $1-\beta >1/2$. The resulting zero cannot have real part greater than one, by the stated zero-free half-plane. It therefore has real part in $(1/2,1]$.

Write $M(x)={\sum }_{n\le x}\mu (n)$ for the Mertens function. Suppose, to the contrary, that for some $\epsilon >0$ the quotient $|M(x)|/x^{1/2-\epsilon }$ were bounded. Partial summation would then makeconverge and define a holomorphic function throughout $\Re s>1/2-\epsilon$. In $\Re s>1$ the Euler product identifies this function with $1/\zeta (s)$, so analytic continuation would make $1/\zeta (s)$ holomorphic in that larger half-plane.

By assumption, $\zeta$ has a nontrivial zero. The functional equation of the Riemann zeta function reflects one of that zero and its partner into $\Re s\ge 1/2$, where $1/\zeta$ must have a pole, a contradiction. Thus $|M(x)|/x^{1/2-\epsilon }$ is unbounded, which gives an $x\ge 1$ exceeding any prescribed constant $C$.

Let $J(s)={\int }_1^{\infty }(\theta (t)-1)t^{s/2-1}dt$, with $\theta (t)={\sum }_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}{e}^{-\pi n^{2}t}$. Exponential decay makes $J$ an entire function. The Jacobi theta function transformation and a substitution in the Mellin transform giveThis continues the completed Riemann zeta function meromorphically, with residues $1$ and $-1$ at $1$ and $0$, and makes the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function immediate. Dividing by the Gamma function removes the apparent pole at zero from $\zeta (s)$.