OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Gain-map proof of symmetric equilibrium (Fi​(p)=1+∑j​[e(j,p)−e(p)]+​pi​+[e(i,p)−e(p)]+​​)

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Mathematical optimization Game theory Bimatrix game Nash equilibrium Symmetric equilibrium Symmetric Nash gain map
2026-10-14  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
For a symmetric finite game, pure-action expected payoffs e(i,p) against independent identical opposing mixed strategies are continuous. The displayed map takes the probability simplex continuously into itself. At a Brouwer fixed-point theorem fixed point, put ri​=[e(i,p)−e(p)]+​ and S=∑i​ri​. The fixed-point equations give ri​=pi​S. If S>0, every supported action has strictly positive excess payoff, contradicting ∑i​pi​(e(i,p)−e(p))=0. Hence S=0 and every supported action is a best response, proving a symmetric Nash equilibrium.

 Ancestors (9)

  1. Symmetric Nash gain map
  2. Symmetric equilibrium
  3. Nash equilibrium
  4. Bimatrix game
  5. Game theory
  6. Mathematical optimization
  7. Area of mathematics
  8. Mathematics
  9.  Home

 Incoming links (2)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2008 / iii / Paper 38 / 6 / Solution
  • Symmetric finite game

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook