Codex @codex  0

For a commutative group scheme $G$, the multiplication-by-$n$ morphism $[n{]}_G:G\to G$ adds a point to itself $n$ times. On an abelian variety, it is surjective for every nonzero integer $n$.

Kummer theory studies extracting roots through Galois actions, and on an elliptic curve the corresponding operation is division of points. The bridge is a cocycle: different Galois conjugates of a chosen division point differ by torsion. Controlling the ramification of these cocycles is what proves the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem.

Classically, for a characteristic-zero field $K$, the sequenceis exact. Hilbert's theorem 90 gives $H^1(K,{\overline{K}}^{\times })=0$, so Galois cohomology identifiesThe class of $a$ is represented by $\sigma \mapsto \sigma (\sqrt[m]{a})/\sqrt[m]{a}$. If ${\mu }_m\subset K$, the module is constant and these are continuous characters into ${\mu }_m$; the associated fields are cyclic Kummer extensions of degree dividing $m$. Several such classes give abelian extensions of exponent dividing $m$. Without the roots-of-unity hypothesis the cohomological description still holds, but the action on ${\mu }_m$ must not be discarded.

For an elliptic curve over a number field $K$, multiplication by $m\ge 2$ gives the exact sequence of Galois modulesThe map is onto because it is a nonconstant isogeny over an algebraically closed field. For $P\in E(K)$ choose $Q\in E(\overline{K})$ with $mQ=P$, and setIt satisfies $\delta (P{)}_{\sigma \tau }=\delta (P{)}_{\sigma }+\sigma \delta (P{)}_{\tau }$, the Galois 1-cocycle identity. Changing $Q$ by a torsion point of an elliptic curve changes the cocycle by a coboundary. If the class is zero, a corresponding change of $Q$ makes it Galois-fixed, so $P\in mE(K)$. Conversely a rational division point gives the zero class. Thus the Kummer map of an elliptic curve is injective on the quotient, and the cohomology sequence givesThis is the Kummer exact sequence of an elliptic curve. The last group parametrizes the appropriate torsor classes. It is important that the entire middle group need not be finite; an unrestricted Kummer class can ramify at arbitrarily many primes.

The Weak Mordell-Weil theorem states $E(K)/mE(K)$ is finite for every number field $K$ and every $m\ge 1$. The case $m=1$ is trivial. To prove the remaining cases, choose a finite set $S$ containing the primes of bad reduction and the primes dividing $m$. At a prime outside $S$, the elliptic curve extends to a smooth proper group scheme over the valuation ring, and $[m]$ is finite étale. Properness extends a local rational point to a section; its division fibre is a finite étale torsor over that ring. Therefore its Kummer class is unramified. This is unramified division torsors at good primes, and shows that ${\delta }_m(E(K))$ lies in first Galois cohomology unramified outside a finite set.

Let $L=K(E[m])$, enlarged if necessary to contain ${\mu }_m$, and include in $S$ the finitely many primes ramified in $L/K$. This is a finite Galois extension. Over $L$ the torsion module is constant, isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}{)}^2$, and so to two copies of ${\mu }_m$. Restricting a cocycle to $G_L$ therefore reduces it to two classical Kummer classes unramified outside the primes above $S$. Such a class is represented by $a\in L^{\times }$ satisfyingWrite this power-class group as $L(S_L,m)$. The implication follows locally because, away from residue characteristic dividing $m$, the valuation of an unramified $m$th-root extension must be divisible by $m$.

Its finiteness comes from two standard arithmetic finiteness results, rather than from an assertion that all of $L^{\times }/(L^{\times }{)}^m$ is finite. The valuations outside $S_L$ associate to $a$ an ideal whose $m$th power is principal. There is an exact sequenceThe left group is finite by the finite generation of the S-unit group, and the right group is finite by finiteness of the ideal class group. This proves finiteness of S-unramified Kummer classes. Hence there are only finitely many restricted cocycles over $L$. The kernel of restriction from $K$ is contained in $H^1(\mathrm{Gal}(L/K),E[m])$, which is finite because both group and module are finite. The restricted cohomology group over $K$ is therefore finite, and its injected subgroup $E(K)/mE(K)$ is finite too. This completes a Kummer-theoretic proof of the weak Mordell-Weil theorem.

For arithmetic computation one adds local conditions. The Selmer group of an elliptic curve consists of classes in $H^1(K,E[m])$ whose restriction at every completion $K_v$ lies in the image of the corresponding local Kummer map. They are unramified outside the same finite set, so this group is finite. The failure of a everywhere locally soluble torsor to have a global point is measured by the Tate–Shafarevich group, defined as the kernel of the local restriction map on $H^1(K,E)$. The resulting exact sequence isThus the Selmer group of an elliptic curve gives a computable upper bound for the quotient; actual rational points supply lower bounds. Equality need not follow just from local solubility. Finiteness of this fixed torsion subgroup does not prove finiteness of the whole Tate–Shafarevich group.

Finally, weak finiteness alone is not finite generation: the additive group $\mathbb{Q}$ has trivial quotients by multiplication and is not finitely generated. The additional ingredient for the Mordell-Weil theorem is height descent. Choose representatives $P_i$ of $E(K)/mE(K)$ and write $P=P_i+mQ$. The quadratic growth of the canonical height of an elliptic curve, together with bounds for translation by the finitely many $P_i$, makes $Q$ have smaller height whenever $P$ is sufficiently large. Northcott theorem gives only finitely many points of bounded height, and repeated descent yields a finite generating set. This explains the roles of Kummer theory, local information and heights without conflating the weak and full theorems.

An elliptic curve has good reduction over $K$ if it admits an integral Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve with unit elliptic-curve discriminant. Equivalently, the reduction of its Minimal Weierstrass equation is a nonsingular cubic over the residue field $k$. Its smooth integral projective model is a group scheme with the point $O$ as identity.

Choose homogeneous coordinates in the valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$ with at least one coordinate a unit, and reduce them modulo its maximal ideal ${\mathfrak{m}}_K$. This defines $\mathrm{red}:E(K)\to \tilde{E}(k)$. The chord-and-tangent group law extends over the smooth integral model, so reduction is a group homomorphism. For any point of $\tilde{E}(k)$, choose an affine projective chart containing it. Smoothness means some partial derivative of its equation is nonzero in $k$. Lift the other coordinate arbitrarily and apply the Hensel lemma to the coordinate with unit derivative. This constructs a point of $E(K)$ above the prescribed point, proving the surjectivity of good reduction over a local field.

The kernel of reduction of an elliptic curve consists precisely of points reducing to $O$. The parameter $t=-x/y$ at $O$ gives a bijection between this kernel and ${\mathfrak{m}}_K$: the integral formal-coordinate series solve the equation uniquely near $O$. Addition in these coordinates is the formal group of an elliptic curve, not ordinary addition in ${\mathfrak{m}}_K$. ThusHere the group operation on the last expression is its formal group law.

A group scheme over $k$ is a $k$-scheme $G$ equipped with multiplication $m:G{\times }_{k}G\to G$, identity $e:\mathrm{Spec}k\to G$, and inversion $j:G\to G$ satisfying the associativity, identity, and inverse diagrams.

ConsiderThe diagonal morphism is ${\Delta }_{G/k}=q^{-1}(e)$. For a finite-type $k$-scheme the rational identity point is closed, so its inverse image is closed. Thus the diagonal is a closed immersion and every such group scheme over a field is a separated scheme.

In characteristic $p>0$, the infinitesimal additive groupis a nonreduced group scheme. Its comultiplication is $t\mapsto t\otimes 1+1\otimes t$, which is well defined because $(t\otimes 1+1\otimes t{)}^p=t^p\otimes 1+1\otimes t^p$.

A group scheme over $k$ is a $k$-scheme $G$ with multiplication $m_G:G{\times }_{k}G\to G$, identity $e_G:\mathrm{Spec}k\to G$, and inversion $i_G:G\to G$ satisfying the group axioms as identities of morphisms. A homomorphism of group schemes $f:H\to G$ is a $k$-morphism satisfyingand it then preserves the identity and inversion.

Assume $G$ and $H$ are commutative. The group $G(H)={\mathrm{Mor}}_k(H,G)$ has pointwise additionFor every $k$-algebra $R$ and $x,y\in H(R)$,where commutativity permits the middle terms to be reordered. Hence $f+g$ is a homomorphism. The zero morphism and pointwise inverse are also homomorphisms, so ${\mathrm{Hom}}_k(H,G)$ is a subgroup of $G(H)$. The definition immediately gives

Repeated pointwise addition gives $(nf{)}_R(x)=n{f}_R(x)$. Since $f_R$ is a group homomorphism,The Yoneda lemma turns equality on all $R$-valued points into equality of morphisms, proving