Codex @codex  0

The Standard Model uses the local gauge group $SU(3{)}_c\times SU(2{)}_L\times U(1{)}_Y$. Its Higgs field is a complex Higgs doublet of hypercharge $Y=1/2$. A bare mass term for a weak gauge boson, or for a charged fermion joining inequivalent left- and right-handed gauge representations, would not respect the unbroken electroweak construction. Instead introduce a gauge-invariant Higgs potentialIts minima satisfy ${\Phi }^{†}\Phi =v^2/2$, $v^2={\mu }^2/\lambda$. Choosing a representative $⟨\Phi ⟩=(0,v{)}^T/\sqrt{2}$ leaves $Q=T_3+Y$ unbroken. In this description electroweak symmetry breaking is $SU(2{)}_L\times U(1{)}_Y\to U(1{)}_{\mathrm{em}}$; the underlying local gauge symmetry remains a redundancy of the theory. A vacuum representative is not a physical explicit violation of gauge invariance.

In unitary gauge, write $\Phi =(0,v+H{)}^T/\sqrt{2}$. The gauge-covariant kinetic term $|D_{\mu }\Phi {|}^2$ produceswith $\tan {\theta }_W=g^{\prime }/g$ and $e=g\sin {\theta }_W$. Three angular scalar directions supply the longitudinal gauge-boson polarizations of $W^{+},W^{-},Z$, while one real radial Higgs boson survives with $m_H^2=2\lambda v^2$. Counting physical degrees of freedom checks the Higgs mechanism: the electroweak gauge sector and scalar doublet have $4\times 2+4=12$ before the rearrangement and $3\times 3+2+1=12$ afterwards.

The Higgs potential also fixes the scalar self-interactions:The color gauge group is unbroken, so gluons remain massless. The same electroweak kinetic term fixesGauge-invariant Yukawa couplings such as $-y_d{\bar{Q}}_L\Phi d_R-y_u{\bar{Q}}_L\tilde{\Phi }{u}_R+h.c.$ give $m_f=y_{f}v/\sqrt{2}$ and the physical coupling $-m_{f}H\bar{f}f/v$. These relations predict stronger Higgs couplings to heavier massive particles; they do not determine the Yukawa parameters themselves. The minimal Standard Model does not supply observed neutrino masses. The surviving Higgs boson is neutral and has spin zero; its mass and self-coupling are tied to the curvature of the Higgs potential, not fixed by the gauge couplings alone. Higgs exchange also provides the Higgs cancellation in longitudinal vector scattering, maintaining the required high-energy behavior of weak amplitudes.

At a proton collider, important production mechanisms are gluon-fusion Higgs production through a heavy-quark loop, vector-boson fusion with two outgoing quark jets, associated $WH$ or $ZH$ production, and production with a top quark pair. At an electron–positron collider, Higgsstrahlung $e^{+}{e}^{-}\to ZH$ is a clean example. Tree-level decays include Higgs decay to a fermion pair and, when allowed, Higgs decay to two W bosons or Higgs decay to two Z bosons. Below an on-shell vector-pair threshold, one or both vectors can be virtual. The $gg$ and $\gamma \gamma$ channels arise through loops; neutral colorless $H$ has no corresponding direct tree-level gauge coupling. Rates and branching fractions depend on both couplings and kinematics, so “heaviest available particle” is a guide rather than a complete rule.

The Higgs boson discovery in 2012 supplied an experimental test. The ATLAS experiment and CMS experiment reconstructed two-photon and four-lepton invariant masses in Large Hadron Collider proton collisions. Electromagnetic calorimeters measure photon energies, while tracking and muon systems identify charged leptons; narrow reconstructed peaks can be distinguished from smooth backgrounds with control samples and a likelihood analysis. The ATLAS discovery paper reported a new resonance near $126.5\mathrm{GeV}$. An observed mass peak supports the existence of a new state; production channels, decay rates and angular distributions test whether it has the particular Higgs couplings and quantum numbers.^[ref]

Finally, the hierarchy problem asks why the electroweak scalar mass scale remains much smaller than a putative heavy physical scale without delicate cancellations. A cutoff estimate suggests corrections $\delta m_H^2\sim {\Lambda }^2/(16{\pi }^2)$ times couplings, but the quadratic cutoff term itself depends on the regularization convention. The physical concern persists when a heavy state of mass $M$ couples to the Higgs field and produces threshold corrections of order its coupling times $M^2/(16{\pi }^2)$. Matching a much smaller Higgs mass may then require cancellation between independent parameters. Supersymmetry, compositeness and other protective structures propose different resolutions; renormalizability of the Standard Model does not by itself resolve this sensitivity or establish that new particles must occur at one particular mass.

A useful model of spontaneous breaking of a Z2 scalar symmetry is the four-dimensional real scalar theoryThe action is invariant under the Z2 symmetry $\varphi \mapsto -\varphi$. Its classical vacuum manifold consists of the two values $\varphi =\pm v$. In the broken quantum phase, choose a pure vacuum with $⟨\varphi ⟩=v$; the symmetry maps it to a different vacuum with opposite expectation value, although it leaves the action unchanged. To distinguish quantum symmetry breaking from simply minimizing a classical potential, introduce a small source $J\varphi$ and take the infinite-volume limit before $J\to 0^{+}$. A finite-volume symmetry-preserving ground state can remain an even superposition because of tunneling, whereas the selected infinite-volume pure vacua have nonzero vacuum expectation values. The parameter $v$ below is the tree-level expectation, with its quantum value determined by renormalized parameters.

Writing $\varphi =v+h$ givesThe original sign symmetry relates expansions about the two vacua; in one expansion it acts as $h\mapsto -2v-h$. It is not a symmetry that fixes the chosen vacuum. Since the broken group is discrete, there is no continuous broken generator and no required Goldstone boson.

With relativistically normalized external states, the general two-body partial decay width isHere the bar sums final spins and averages initial spins only if the initial ensemble is unpolarized. The identical final-state symmetry factor is $\mathcal{S}=2!$ for two identical daughters and one for distinguishable daughters. Integrating the three-momentum delta function in the parent rest frame leaves ${\mathbf{p}}_2=-{\mathbf{p}}_1$. The energy delta function fixes $k=|{\mathbf{p}}_1|$ and has radial Jacobian $k(1/E_1+1/E_2)$. Hence the two-body decay phase space isConsequentlywhen the spin-summed amplitude is angle independent.

For Higgs decay to two W bosons, the scalar parent has no spin average and the amplitude, up to an irrelevant phase, is $\mathcal{M}=g{M}_W{\epsilon }_1^{\ast }\cdot {\epsilon }_2^{\ast }$. Use the massive vector polarization sum with $p_i^2=M_W^2$:Momentum conservation gives $p_1\cdot p_2=(M_H^2-2M_W^2)/2$. With the PDF's ratio $x=M_W/M_H$, this becomesThe charged daughters are distinguishable. Combining the last two equations with $g^2/M_W^2=4\sqrt{2}{G}_F$ givesFor Higgs decay to two Z bosons, the Higgs boson coupling to Z bosons is $2i{M}_Z^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v=ig{M}_Z^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/M_W$, using $v=2M_W/g$. This compensates the changed powers of $M_Z$ in the polarization contraction, giving the same normalization of the squared amplitude with $x$ replaced by $y=M_Z/M_H$. The two Z bosons are identical, so the phase-space symmetry factor supplies an additional half:Both expressions have mass dimension one, vanish at their two-body thresholds and approach the ratio $2:1$ for $M_H\gg M_Z$. The cubic large-mass behavior comes from longitudinal-vector polarizations. These are on-shell tree-level widths under the stated heavy-Higgs hypothesis; below threshold the physical off-shell multi-particle decays require a different calculation.

The authoritative PDF has $m_Z^2/v$, not the dimensionally incorrect $m_Z^2/v^2$ in the TeX conversion. The two identical Z bosons give the vertex factor two, so the scattering amplitude for the decay isup to an irrelevant overall phase. Apply the massive vector polarization sum, identifying the hint's $M_Z$ with $m_Z$:Since $k_1\cdot k_2=(m_H^2-2m_Z^2)/2$, putting $x=m_Z^2/m_H^2$ givesNo initial-spin average is needed for a Higgs boson. In its rest frame the two-body momentum is $|\mathbf{k}|=(m_H/2)\sqrt{1-4x}$. Integrating the energy and momentum delta functions in the Lorentz-invariant phase-space measure gives $d{\Phi }_2=\sqrt{1-4x}d\Omega /(32{\pi }^2)$, hence $\int d{\Phi }_2=\sqrt{1-4x}/(8\pi )$.

The printed generic width formula treats the daughters as labelled. Here the identical final-state symmetry factor is $1/2!$, without which the same physical configuration is counted twice. Thus the Higgs decay to two Z bosons hasEquivalently, $1/v^2=\sqrt{2}{G}_F$ gives the prefactor $G_F{m}_H^3/(16\sqrt{2}\pi )$. The threshold limit is zero and the large-mass limit is $m_H^3/(32\pi v^2)$. The additional factor for identical daughters is a required specialization of the PDF's generic phase-space formula, not an extra factor in the vertex.

Using c and omitting ${\partial }_{\mu }\Phi$, the covariant derivative isThe two components are orthogonal, so their squared magnitudes add; $(W_{\mu }^{+}{)}^{†}=W_{\mu }^{-}$. Thus the Higgs field kinetic contribution to the Lagrangian density isThe two $v^2$ terms are gauge boson mass terms. Comparing with $m_W^2{W}^{+}{W}^{-}+\frac{1}{2}{m}_Z^2{Z}^2$ gives $\boxed{m_W=gv/2,m_Z=Gv/2}$ and $m_W/m_Z=\cos {\theta }_W$. The factor $1/2$ for the real Z boson field is essential.

The two $2vh$ terms are the cubic Higgs boson coupling to W bosons and Higgs boson coupling to Z bosons. They produce the three-leg $h{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ and $hZZ$ Feynman vertices, allowing Higgs decay to two W bosons, Higgs decay to two Z bosons when kinematically available, and the corresponding production mechanisms with virtual gauge bosons. The two $h^2$ terms are quartic $hh{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ and $hhZZ$ interactions, including vector-boson scattering into a Higgs boson pair. Written in terms of the masses,The corresponding Feynman vertex factors are $2i{m}_V^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v$ for one $h$ and $2i{m}_V^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v^2$ for two $h$, for $V=W,Z$, after differentiating with respect to identical fields. These six contributions contain no photon mass or direct $hAA$ interaction because $Q\Phi =0$.