Codex @codex  0

The hip is the joint region connecting the femur to the pelvis. The femoral head articulates with the acetabulum, while capsule, ligaments and muscles stabilize movement. Its deeper socket favors a different mobility-stability balance from the shallower shoulder joint.

The four names identify distinct pathways: chorda tympani, the sensory buccal nerve, the radial nerve formerly called musculospiral, and the obturator nerve. Origin must include the parent nerve or nerve plexus, while the function must follow the actual fibre supply rather than the name of a structure crossed.

Chorda tympani. This branch leaves the facial nerve in its descending facial canal before the stylomastoid foramen. It enters the tympanic cavity from behind, passes forwards between the malleus and incus close to the inner surface of the tympanic membrane, and leaves through the petrotympanic fissure. In the infratemporal fossa it joins the lingual nerve, a branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve. It then travels with that carrier towards the tongue and submandibular ganglion.

The chorda tympani carries taste from the anterior two thirds of the tongue, with sensory cell bodies in the geniculate ganglion and central connections to the nucleus of the solitary tract. It also carries preganglionic parasympathetic fibres from the superior salivatory nucleus towards the submandibular ganglion; postganglionic fibres supply the submandibular gland and sublingual gland. It does not provide the general touch supply of that part of the tongue; that travels through the lingual nerve's trigeminal nerve pathway. Taste and tactile testing can consequently distinguish two functions that briefly share one peripheral trunk.^[ref]

Buccal nerve. In the usual anatomical meaning intended by this list, this is the long buccal nerve from the anterior division of the mandibular trigeminal nerve. It commonly emerges between the heads of the lateral pterygoid muscle, descends near the anterior border of the mandibular ramus and the temporalis muscle insertion, and passes towards the cheek. Its branches reach cheek skin, the buccal mucosa, and the buccal gingiva beside the lower molars. It is principally sensory. The motor supply of the buccinator muscle comes from the facial nerve, whose buccal branches are a different set of nerves. Thus the ability to hold the cheek against the teeth and sensation in the cheek are not tests of the same efferent pathway.^[ref]

Radial nerve, historically musculospiral. This is the major continuation of the posterior cord of the brachial plexus, usually containing fibres from C5–T1. It passes from the axilla into the posterior arm, accompanying the profunda brachii artery in the radial groove of the humerus. It pierces the lateral intermuscular septum and reaches the anterior compartment between brachialis and brachioradialis. Near the lateral elbow it divides into a superficial sensory branch and a deep motor branch. The latter passes through the supinator muscle and continues as the posterior interosseous nerve.

The radial nerve supplies triceps brachii and anconeus, then brachioradialis, the radial wrist extensors and, through its deep continuation, the principal finger and thumb extensors and associated posterior forearm muscles. Its sensory branches supply posterior arm and forearm regions and part of the dorsolateral hand. A lesion's level matters: an arm lesion can impair wrist and finger extension, while an isolated superficial branch lesion is sensory and does not itself cause a wrist drop. Conversely, a posterior interosseous nerve lesion chiefly affects motor function. The fingertip pads are not the characteristic autonomous sensory territory of the superficial radial nerve.^[ref]

Obturator nerve. It arises from the anterior divisions of the anterior rami of L2–L4 in the lumbar plexus. It emerges from the medial border of psoas major, crosses the pelvic side wall and leaves through the obturator canal with the obturator vessels. Its anterior and posterior divisions characteristically run on opposite sides of adductor brevis, although the level of division varies. The anterior division supplies adductor longus, gracilis and commonly adductor brevis; the posterior division supplies obturator externus and the adductor portion of adductor magnus, with variable additional contributions. The hamstring portion of adductor magnus has a different supply. Cutaneous supply to a variable medial-thigh patch and articular branches to the hip and knee supplement its principal motor role in thigh adduction. Obturator internus is supplied by its own sacral-plexus nerve, not by the obturator nerve merely because the names resemble one another.^[ref][ref]

Sarcopterygii is the clade comprising the most recent common ancestor of living coelacanths, lungfish and tetrapods, together with all its descendants. In this crown-based usage, humans are sarcopterygians: acquisition of limbs and loss of a fish-like outline do not remove descendants from a clade. Extinct taxa assigned along the stem require an explicitly broader total-group usage. A diagnosis lists characters useful for recognizing a group; a synapomorphy is a shared derived character whose position has been inferred on a phylogenetic tree. Those are related but not interchangeable statements.

Two particularly instructive traditional diagnostic features are the fleshy, internally supported paired appendages and true enamel associated with the dentition. The first survives conspicuously in our arms and legs. The second survives in our tooth crowns, although modern evidence requires qualification of its traditional status as an exclusively sarcopterygian innovation.

The paired-appendage transformation. A lobed fin contains musculature and a substantial endoskeleton extending into the appendage. In the relevant ancestral pattern, a single proximal skeletal element connects to the girdle: the humerus in the pectoral appendage, and the femur in the pelvic appendage. Subsequent elements elaborate the jointed internal axis. The important comparison is historical organization and articulations, not merely that both a fin and an arm contain bone. fins in other lineages also possess internal supporting elements, so the presence of any fin skeleton is too broad a diagnosis.

Within the lineage leading to tetrapods, the pectoral series can be recognized as humerus, radius bone and ulna, followed by increasingly elaborate distal elements. Tiktaalik retains fin rays but has a distal jointed skeleton capable of limb-like positioning against a substrate. Its combination of characters shows that parts of a wrist-like support system preceded a fully digit-bearing hand. Comparing several articulated specimens and the geometry of joint surfaces constrains the reconstruction better than matching isolated bones by outline.^[ref]

Further changes included anatomical digits, loss of external fin rays in the limb, changes to the girdles and altered force transmission through the trunk. They did not all arise simultaneously. Early digit-bearing tetrapods were not uniformly five-fingered terrestrial walkers; aquatic settings and polydactyly make it misleading to present the modern human hand as the immediate purpose or original endpoint of the transition. Acanthostega, with eight anatomical digits in its forelimb, supplies a concrete counterexample to an ancestrally universal five-digit condition.^[ref]

Our own upper limb retains the proximal single-bone and paired-bone organization, but the shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers are extensively specialized. Rotation of the radius bone relative to the ulna contributes to turning the forearm; an opposable thumb and independently controlled fingers support grasping. In the lower limb, the femur, tibia and fibula show the corresponding serial organization, while the pelvis, hip, knee and foot transmit loads in habitual bipedalism. These are derived modifications within tetrapods, rather than defining traits of all Sarcopterygii. Comparing our arm with a fish pectoral fin concerns biological homology between organisms; comparing arm and leg also involves serial homology within the body.

The dental transformation and its qualification. human tooth crowns have an outer layer of enamel over dentine. enamel is highly mineralized and is produced by epithelial ameloblasts, whereas dentine is a different tissue formed by odontoblasts. Identifying a fossil surface as enamel therefore requires tissue architecture and developmental or molecular comparison, not simply a shiny hard covering. In our teeth the coating has specialized organization into enamel rods and contributes to wear resistance during biting and chewing. tooth classes and crown shapes diversify the ancestral feeding apparatus; they are not themselves basal sarcopterygian synapomorphies. After eruption, loss of the enamel-producing cellular layer severely limits biological replacement of worn crown enamel.

The traditional contrast between sarcopterygian true tooth enamel and other hard coverings needs an explicit historical correction. Qingming Qu and colleagues combined fossil histology with evidence for enamel-matrix genes in the skin of gar. In Psarolepis, external odontodes carried enamel while the teeth lacked an enamel coating. Their evidence supported an origin in dermal coverings followed by expansion into the mouth, and an ancestry deeper than Sarcopterygii alone.^[ref] Thus enamel and its oral deployment must be coded separately; tooth enamel remains a useful traditional diagnostic comparison, but the tissue itself is not a uniquely sarcopterygian synapomorphy. Shared tissue can undergo heterotopy, loss and later modification.

The two histories illustrate different forms of transformation visible in our bodies: an internally supported paired fin became a jointed, digit-bearing, specialized limb, and an inherited mineralized epithelial covering acquired a complex role in our dentition. A rigorous diagnosis states the anatomical level being compared and distinguishes inherited organization from later functional specialization. Neither the modern function nor the external human appearance determines membership of Sarcopterygii.