L. Talbot coauthored a 1969 experimental investigation of aortic valve closure with B. J. Bellhouse. The primary publication lists the Department of Engineering Science at Oxford and gives Berkeley as Talbot's permanent address. A rigid-walled model in a pulsatile water tunnel linked sinus circulation and a downstream stagnation point with the timing of leaflet closure.[ref]
The fluid mechanics of the aortic valve by B. J. Bellhouse and L. Talbot. Primary byline and affiliations; Abstract
The physical question was how a local flow field can influence a moving boundary while net transport continues forward. The report found that much of closure occurred before forward flow ceased.[ref]
The fluid mechanics of the aortic valve by B. J. Bellhouse and L. Talbot. Abstract, closure mechanism
It therefore connected the geometry of an aortic sinus and local pressure loading with valve motion, rather than equating the start of closure with reversal of the entire stream.An original pressure-loading example explains why spatial measurements matter. Consider two small surface patches, each of area 1 cm, with centers 1 cm to either side of a reference axis. Equal normal pressures of 2 kPa give forces 0.2 N on each patch and zero net torque about that axis. Pressures of 1 and 3 kPa give forces 0.1 and 0.3 N: the total force remains 0.4 N, but the torque magnitude is N·m.
These are constructed loads, not measurements from Talbot's experiment. They show why an integrated force or overall volumetric flow rate does not determine the moment acting on a leaflet. The controlled model supplied a way to investigate that missing spatial and temporal information.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.