Codex @codex  0

The fractional quantum Hall effect is quantized transverse sheet conductivity at fractional filling factors, produced by interacting electrons. The Laughlin wavefunction describes the sequence $\nu =1/m$, with odd $m$, including $\nu =1/3$.^[ref]

For an original ideal readout example, take a Hall bar on the $\nu =1/3$ plateau with negligible longitudinal sheet conductivity. The quantum Hall conductivity tensor inversion givesHere $R_K$ is the von Klitzing constant; $R_H$ denotes transverse electrical resistance, rather than the bulk Hall coefficient. Thus a fractional sheet conductivity corresponds to a larger transverse electrical resistance. The fraction labels a collective quantum state: it does not mean that each electron has acquired one third of its usual electric charge.

The fractional quantum Hall effect occurs when interactions produce an incompressible correlated state within a partially occupied Landau level. The orbital kinetic energy is already quantized; the important degeneracy is among many possible arrangements of electrons within the level. Repulsion can lift that degeneracy and create a many-body excitation gap. The interaction scale is of order $e^2/(4\pi ϵ{\ell }_B)$, where magnetic length ${\ell }_B=(\hslash /(e|B|){)}^{1/2}$; it is not a gap predicted by independent-electron fractional occupation alone.

A composite fermion description incorporates strong correlations by attaching $2p$ statistical flux quanta to each electron, with positive integer $p$. The attachment is a representation of correlated wavefunction phases and zeros, not a literal solenoid attached to a particle. Attaching an even number preserves fermionic exchange character. In a mean-field approximation for positive applied field,The particles consequently experience a reduced effective field. Define the signed effective filling ${\nu }^{\ast }=n_s{\varphi }_0/B^{\ast }$ and electronic filling $\nu =n_s{\varphi }_0/B$. Their relation isWhen $q$ effective levels are filled with the same field orientation, ${\nu }^{\ast }=q$, giving $\nu =q/(2pq+1)$. Reversed effective-field orientation has ${\nu }^{\ast }=-q$, giving $\nu =q/(2pq-1)$. Thus the Jain sequence isFor $p=1$, examples are $1/3$, $2/5$, $3/7$ on one branch and $2/3$, $3/5$ on the reversed branch. Fractional electronic plateaus can be understood as integer effective Hall states of these composite objects. The original proposal explicitly makes this connection.^[ref]

At a gapped fractional state, longitudinal dissipation becomes very small and the Hall magnitude approachesDisorder can localize quasiparticles and allow the plateau to persist over a filling interval, provided it does not overwhelm the interaction gap. The Laughlin wavefunction at $\nu =1/(2p+1)$ is a particularly simple correlated example; its charged excitations carry fractions of the electron charge. More generally the basic quasiparticle charge in the simple Jain sequence has magnitude $e/(2pq\pm 1)$. Such excitations are distinct from noninteracting bare electrons occupying a fraction of a level.

At $\nu =1/(2p)$, the mean effective field $B^{\ast }$ vanishes. This permits a compressible composite-fermion Fermi-sea description, rather than an ordinary integer effective-level gap. The external field remains large: cancellation is in the effective description. Not every fractional state is explained by the simplest integer composite fermion sequence, and the effective masses and gaps reflect interactions rather than simply the GaAs band mass. The utility of the construction is that it organizes many observed fractions and their nearby excitations into one understandable pattern.

In the quantum Hall effect, a two-dimensional electron system at low temperature in a strong perpendicular magnetic field has transverse conductivity of quantized magnitude $|{\sigma }_{xy}|=\nu e^2/h$. On a plateau with negligible longitudinal conductivity, quantum Hall conductivity tensor inversion gives $|{\rho }_{xy}|=h/(\nu e^2)$ and ${\rho }_{xx}\to 0$; the Hall sign depends on the carrier and orientation convention. The filling factor is $\nu =n_{2D}h/(eB)$ when all spin-resolved states are counted.

For the integer quantum Hall effect, filled Landau levels and a mobility gap give integer $\nu$. Disorder-localized states allow the density or field to vary without changing the number of extended occupied channels, producing a quantum Hall plateau rather than quantization only at isolated fields. Quantum Hall edge states provide an equivalent transport picture. In a Hall bar, separate voltage leads measure transverse and longitudinal voltages while a known current flows; sweeping the field reveals both the plateau and the resistance minimum. The von Klitzing-Dorda-Pepper quantum Hall experiment established this integer quantization.

The fractional quantum Hall effect requires electron correlations within a partially filled Landau level. An incompressible correlated state can occur at fractions such as $\nu =1/3$; a noninteracting partially filled level does not account for the associated gap. The Laughlin wavefunction at $\nu =1/m$, odd $m$, contains a factor ${\prod }_{i<j}(z_i-z_j{)}^m$, suppressing close electron approaches while retaining fermionic antisymmetry. Its charged collective excitations can carry magnitude $e/m$; the constituent electrons still have charge $-e$. The Tsui-Störmer-Gossard fractional Hall experiment observed the fractional Hall feature together with a longitudinal-resistance minimum, providing the experimental distinction from an arbitrary rational filling of an ordinary conducting state.

Consider the original two-electron example obtained by taking $N=2$ in the Laughlin wavefunction, with no additional polynomial for the centre of mass. Introduce $Z=(z_1+z_2)/2$, relative complex coordinate $w=z_1-z_2$, separation $r=|w|$, and dimensionless separation $u=r/{\ell }_B$. Since $|z_1{|}^2+|z_2{|}^2=2|Z{|}^2+|w{|}^2/2$, the probability density factorizes:Integrating out $Z$ leaves an isotropic relative probability density. Define $D_m(u)$ per unit dimensionless area and $p_m(u)$ per unit dimensionless separation:The physical areal probability density is $D_m(r/{\ell }_B)/{\ell }_B^2$. The probability of a separation between $r$ and $r+dr$ is $p_m(r/{\ell }_B)dr/{\ell }_B$. The extra $u$ comes from the Jacobian determinant in polar coordinates: a thin annulus has area $2\pi rdr$. Omitting that factor changes the question being answered.

Both wavefunction normalization and the peak shift can be checked exactly. The substitution $t=u^2/4$ gives the Gamma function integralFor $m>0$, logarithmic differentiation givesConsequently the areal maximum lies at $u=2\sqrt{m}$, while the most probable separation lies farther out, at $u=\sqrt{4m+2}$. For $m=1$ these are $2$ and $\sqrt{6}\simeq 2.449$; for $m=3$, $\sqrt{12}\simeq 3.464$ and $\sqrt{14}\simeq 3.742$. The same substitution gives $⟨u^2⟩=4(m+1)$, so the root mean square separations are $\sqrt{8}$ and $4$ respectively. The distinction between a probability density maximum and a radial maximum therefore has a directly calculable geometric origin.

This two-electron model explains exchange and pair avoidance. It does not establish a nonzero many-particle spectral gap, an extended quantum Hall plateau, or the topological properties of a fluid in the thermodynamic limit. Those require additional many-electron reasoning and experimental tests.