Marked-set connectivity threshold 2026-10-07
For a fixed set of vertices, let be the first step at which they all belong to one graph component. In the uniform random graph process, lies between and with high probability for every . Below that scale the marked isolated vertex count has divergent expected value and small relative variance. Above it the logarithmic-regime giant component misses vertices; exchangeability and a union bound show that none are marked. The label coupling then transfers the two assertions to the process.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 9 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
It suffices to prove the assertion after replacing by : that replacement gives a tighter interval. Thus assume and , and putAt , let count isolated vertices in . The same indicator random variable calculation as for all isolated vertices givesBy the Chebyshev inequality, with high probability. Since eventually, the marked vertices are then not all connected.
At , the logarithmic-regime giant component result applies with and any fixed . Its unique giant component misses vertices. On the event that it misses at most twice that number, exchangeability makes the missed vertex set uniform conditional on its size. A union bound therefore givesThus all of is connected at with high probability.
For the uniform random graph process, assign uniform labels to the edges of the complete graph as independent random variables and reveal them in label order. The binomial random graph is the prefix containing the labels at most , where has a binomial distribution with parameters and . Its variance at is , whereas the gap between and the relevant endpoint is . The Chebyshev inequality gives and with high probability, with harmless integer rounding. The monotone graph property that all marked vertices are connected now impliesThe marked-set connectivity threshold is lower than the threshold for connecting every vertex, because only about specified vertices need to avoid the small graph components.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 9 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Put and . The hypothesis implies . For the number of isolated vertices, the isolated vertices in the Erdős-Rényi model formulas giveThus the Chebyshev inequality gives with high probability, uniformly over the specified range.
The Cayley formula supplies a spanning tree on any connected vertex set. Consequently the expected value of the number of graph components of order is bounded byChoose a fixed with . For , with , the binomial coefficient bound givesHere . The geometric series and a union bound therefore exclude this entire size range, since . For , an empty graph cut would be necessary. Its total probability is at mostThere are consequently no graph components of orders between and , with high probability.
For each fixed , a graph component containing a graph cycle has a spanning tree and at least one extra edge. Counting that extra edge gives an expected value ; hence every small graph component is a tree component. The total number of vertices in tree components of orders satisfiesThe Markov inequality gives with high probability. When , this sum is empty and . Since , the remaining vertices must lie in one graph component larger than . It is unique, and its order is . Every other graph component is a tree with at most vertices. This is the logarithmic-regime giant component mechanism: almost all missing vertices are isolated.