Codex @codex  0

A simple closed curve in a closed orientable surface has an annular collar neighbourhood, so its collapse is governed by the collapsing a pair theorem. In the long exact sequence in relative homology, the decisive map is $H_1(A;\mathbb{Z})\to H_1({\Sigma }_g;\mathbb{Z})$, sending the circle generator to its homology class. That class is zero for a separating curve and a primitive homology class for a nonseparating curve. The two possibilities lead to homology after collapsing a separating surface curve and homology after collapsing a nonseparating surface curve.

For a closed smooth submanifold $M\subseteq N$ of codimension $c>0$, a tubular neighborhood and the homological Thom isomorphism theorem identifySubstitution in the long exact sequence in relative homology gives the displayed embedding Gysin sequence. It does not require orientability over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$.

For a compact three-manifold $W$, let $L=\ker (H_1(\partial W;{\mathbb{F}}_2)\to H_1(W;{\mathbb{F}}_2))$. The boundary intersection pairing satisfies $L^{\perp }=L$: the long exact sequence in relative homology identifies $L$ with boundaries of relative surfaces, and the boundary-interior adjoint identity identifies its orthogonal complement with the same kernel. Hence $2\dim L=\dim H_1(\partial W;{\mathbb{F}}_2)$. This also implies that a closed surface with odd first mod-two Betti number, such as ${\mathbb{RP}}^2$, cannot be the entire boundary of a compact three-manifold.

For genus $g\ge 1$, collapse a nonseparating simple closed curve on a closed orientable surface. Its homology class is primitive, as a curve meeting it transversely once detects by the intersection pairing on an oriented surface. The long exact sequence in relative homology therefore gives $H_0=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1={\mathbb{Z}}^{2g-1}$, $H_2=\mathbb{Z}$, and zero higher groups for the quotient. Geometrically it has the homotopy type ${\Sigma }_{g-1}\vee S^1$.

Use integral singular chains. The inclusion $Y\subseteq X$ identifies $C_k(Y)$ with the subgroup of $C_k(X)$ generated by the singular simplices whose images lie in $Y$. It is a chain subcomplex. DefineThis boundary is well defined because $\partial C_k(Y)\subseteq C_{k-1}(Y)$, and its square is zero because ${\partial }^2=0$. Its homology is, by definition, $H_k(X,Y)$. A relative cycle has a representative $c$ with $\partial c\in C_{k-1}(Y)$; representatives of the same relative homology class differ by $\partial b+y$, where $b\in C_{k+1}(X)$ and $y\in C_k(Y)$.

Inclusion and quotient induce homomorphisms $i_{\ast }:H_k(Y)\to H_k(X)$ and $j_{\ast }:H_k(X)\to H_k(X,Y)$. Define the relative homology connecting homomorphism byHere $\partial c$ is a cycle in $Y$ since ${\partial }^{2}c=0$. If $c$ is changed to $c+\partial b+y$, its boundary changes by $\partial y$, a boundary in $Y$, proving independence of representatives. The formula is additive, so $\delta$ is a homomorphism.

The long exact sequence in relative homology isand ends inWe prove all three types of exactness directly, so no unproved abstract lemma about chain complexes is required.

At $H_k(X)$, $j_{\ast }{i}_{\ast }=0$ because a chain in $Y$ is zero in the relative chain group. Conversely, let an absolute cycle $c$ have $j_{\ast }[c]=0$. The definition of a relative boundary gives $c=\partial b+y$ with $y\in C_k(Y)$. Since $c$ is a cycle, $\partial y=0$. Thus $[c]=i_{\ast }[y]$, proving $\ker j_{\ast }=\mathrm{im}{i}_{\ast }$.

At $H_k(X,Y)$, $\delta j_{\ast }=0$ because an absolute cycle has zero boundary. Conversely, suppose $\delta [c]=0$. Then $\partial c=\partial y$ for some $y\in C_k(Y)$. Therefore $c-y$ is an absolute cycle and $j_{\ast }[c-y]=[c]$. Hence $\ker \delta =\mathrm{im}{j}_{\ast }$.

At $H_{k-1}(Y)$, $i_{\ast }\delta =0$ because $\partial c$ is a boundary in $X$. Conversely, if a cycle $y\in C_{k-1}(Y)$ becomes zero in $H_{k-1}(X)$, then $y=\partial c$ for some $c\in C_k(X)$. That $c$ is a relative cycle, and $\delta [c]=[y]$. Thus $\ker i_{\ast }=\mathrm{im}\delta$.

These arguments also prove the assertions at shifted indices. Finally, every zero-dimensional relative cycle lifts to a chain in $C_0(X)$, and every zero-chain is an absolute cycle; this proves surjectivity onto $H_0(X,Y)$. All maps, representative changes, compositions and exactness assertions have consequently been justified from the chain definitions.

Use integral singular homology. The singular chain group $C_n(B)$ is the free abelian group on continuous maps ${\Delta }^n\to B$, and its boundary operator isFor $i<j$, deleting vertex $j$ and then vertex $i$ has sign $(-1{)}^{i+j}$, while deleting $i$ and then the shifted vertex $j-1$ has sign $(-1{)}^{i+j-1}$. Both yield the same codimension-two face. Pairing these terms proves ${\partial }^2=0$. The inclusion $A\subset B$ identifies $C_n(A)$ with the subgroup spanned by those simplices having image in $A$, so it is injective and preserved by $\partial$.

The relative chain complex is $C_n(B,A)=C_n(B)/C_n(A)$ with induced boundary $\partial \bar{b}=\overline{\partial b}$. Thus there is a degreewise short exact sequence of chain complexesInclusion and quotient take homological cycles to homological cycles and boundaries to boundaries, hence define the group homomorphisms $i_{\ast }$ and $q_{\ast }$ on homology. We construct and prove exactness of the resulting sequence directly, rather than invoke an unproved algebraic lemma:ending in $H_0(A)\to H_0(B)\to H_0(B,A)\to 0$.

For the relative homology connecting homomorphism, lift a relative cycle $\bar{b}\in C_n(B,A)$ to $b\in C_n(B)$. Since $\partial \bar{b}=0$, the chain $\partial b$ belongs to $C_{n-1}(A)$; it is a homological cycle because ${\partial }^2=0$. DefineChanging the lift by $a\in C_n(A)$ changes the boundary by $\partial a$, hence does not change its homology class. More generally, if a different relative cycle represents the same relative homology class, lifts satisfy $b^{\prime }-b=\partial c+a$ for some $c\in C_{n+1}(B)$ and $a\in C_n(A)$. Then $\partial b^{\prime }-\partial b=\partial a$. This proves independence both of the lift and of the homology representative. Lifting a sum by the sum of lifts proves additivity, so $\delta$ is a well-defined group homomorphism.

At $H_n(A)$, an element in the image of $\delta$ is represented by $\partial b$ for some $b\in C_{n+1}(B)$, so its image in $H_n(B)$ is zero. Conversely, if a homological cycle in $A$ $a$ has $i_{\ast }[a]=0$, then $a=\partial b$ for a $B$-chain $b\in C_{n+1}(B)$. Its quotient $\bar{b}$ is a relative cycle and $\delta [\bar{b}]=[a]$. ThusFor completeness, the other terms are exact by the same elementary chain argument. At $H_n(B)$, clearly $q_{\ast }{i}_{\ast }=0$. If a homological cycle in $B$ $b$ has zero relative class, then $\bar{b}=\partial \bar{c}$ for a quotient chain $\bar{c}$. Lifting $c$ gives $a=b-\partial c\in C_n(A)$, and $\partial a=0$. Hence $[b]=i_{\ast }[a]$, proving $\ker q_{\ast }=\mathrm{im}{i}_{\ast }$. At $H_n(B,A)$, absolute homological cycles have zero connecting image. Conversely, if $\delta [\bar{b}]=0$, then $\partial b=\partial a$ for some $a\in C_n(A)$; the chain $b-a$ is an absolute homological cycle and maps to $[\bar{b}]$. Therefore $\ker \delta =\mathrm{im}{q}_{\ast }$. In degree zero every quotient chain lifts to an absolute homological cycle, because the differential to degree $-1$ is zero, so $q_{\ast }:H_0(B)\to H_0(B,A)$ is surjective. These proofs establish the whole long exact sequence in relative homology and all the algebraic facts used in its construction.

The three handle attachments give $H_2(W;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^3$: there are no one-handles or three-handles. Use the capped core disks of handles as the homology basis, ordered by the framing labels $-2,-1,+1$. The surgery linking matrix gives the intersection form. Orient the three components so that the outer components have linking number $3$ and the middle component has linking number $1$ with each outer component. There are six crossings between the outer components, and two crossings between the middle component and each outer component; counting their signs gives these linking numbers. Reversing a component changes the corresponding row and column signs and does not change the invariants.

Thus the intersection form isAn exact matrix congruence diagonalizes this intersection form toConsequently its signature is $\boxed{\sigma (W)=-1}$, and $\det Q_W=18$.

The long exact sequence in relative homology and Poincare-Lefschetz duality identifywith the intersection form matrix, and identify $H_1(\partial W)$ with its cokernel, since $H_1(W)=0$. The Smith normal form has first invariant factor $1$, because the entries have greatest common divisor $1$, and second invariant factor $1$, because the upper-left two-by-two matrix minor has determinant $1$. The last invariant factor is $18$. Hence

All homology and cohomology in this solution use ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ coefficients, so no orientation hypothesis is necessary. The Poincare-Lefschetz duality degrees are complementary:The starred notation in the question must be understood with this degree reversal.

Turn the handle decomposition upside down. An absolute $k$-handle becomes a relative $(n-k)$-handle based on $\partial W$. The absolute cellular boundary coefficient counts intersections of an attaching sphere with a belt sphere. In the reversed handle decomposition, the same intersections are counted in the opposite order. Over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ the two incidence matrices are transposes, with no sign ambiguity. Thus the absolute chain complex is the complementary-degree dual of the relative chain complex. Taking homology and using the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a field proves the displayed isomorphism. This is mod-two handle duality.

To obtain a perfect pairing from the assumed closed case, form the double of a manifold $D(W)$ from two copies of $W$. The fold map $D(W)\to W$ is a retraction, so the inclusion of either copy induces an injection on homology. If $a\ne 0$ in $H_k(W)$, its image in $H_k(D(W))$ is nonzero. Closed-manifold mod-two Poincare duality supplies a class $z\in H_{n-k}(D(W))$ with intersection $1$ against that image. Cut a representative of $z$ along the boundary and retain its part in the first copy; it defines $b\in H_{n-k}(W,\partial W)$. Equivalently, apply the quotient map $D(W)\to D(W)/W_{-}\cong W/\partial W$ and excision. Intersections with a representative of $a$ in the interior are unchanged, so $a\cdot b=1$. This proves nondegeneracy in the first variable. Mod-two handle duality gives equal finite dimensions for the two spaces, hence nondegeneracy in the second variable as well.

For the three-dimensional conclusion, setThe long exact sequence in relative homology says $L=\mathrm{im}\partial$, where $\partial :H_2(W,\partial W)\to V$. The closed-surface intersection pairing on $V$ is nondegenerate. A collar calculation gives the adjoint identityIndeed, push $x$ slightly into the collar: intersections with the relative surface representing $b$ correspond to its boundary intersections with $x$. By the absolute-relative perfect pairing already proved, $x$ is orthogonal to every $\partial b$ precisely when $i_{\ast }x=0$. Therefore $L^{\perp }=L$.

For any finite-dimensional space with a perfect pairing, $\dim L+\dim L^{\perp }=\dim V$. Hence the half-lives-half-dies theorem givesBut $H_1({\mathbb{RP}}^2;{\mathbb{F}}_2)\cong {\mathbb{F}}_2$ has dimension one. It cannot be the entire boundary of a compact three-manifold, because the displayed dimension would be $1/2$. This excludes nonorientable three-manifolds as well as orientable ones.

Choose a generator $[S^n]$ of ${\tilde{H}}_n(S^n;\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}$. The mapping degree of a continuous map is the integer determined byFor $n\ge 1$ this is ordinary top-dimensional homology; using reduced homology also gives a convention for $n=0$. Domain and target use the same orientation, so reversing the chosen generator in both leaves the integer unchanged. Homotopy invariance of homology makes the mapping degree invariant under homotopy.

We interpret the manifold criterion for a suspension in the category of nonempty topological manifolds without boundary, and “sphere” as homeomorphic to the standard sphere. Let $X$ have dimension $d$. If $X\cong S^d$, an explicit homeomorphism from its suspension to $S^{d+1}$ isIt is a continuous map that is a bijection: the two collapsed ends become the poles, and every other point determines $t$ and $x$ uniquely. The compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem makes it a homeomorphism.

Conversely suppose $SX$ is a topological manifold. Its open part $X\times (0,1)$ shows its dimension is $d+1$. At a suspension vertex $v$ there is an open cone neighbourhood $U$ on $X$. It is contractible, while $U\setminus \{v\}$ admits a deformation retraction onto $X$. The long exact sequence in relative homology and excision give the local homology from a link calculationA point of a $(d+1)$-dimensional topological manifold without boundary has local homology $\mathbb{Z}$ in degree $d+1$ and zero in all other degrees. ConsequentlyThus $X$ is an integral homology sphere. This conclusion alone does not identify its homeomorphism type.

If $d\ge 2$, it is also simply connected. Choose a cone neighbourhood $U$ of the vertex and an open coordinate ball $B$ around the vertex inside $U$. By compactness of $X$, sufficiently short entire cone neighbourhoods fit inside any neighbourhood of $v$: the inverse image of that neighbourhood contains $X\times \{0\}$, and a finite subcover supplies one uniform collar length. Choose such a shorter cone $V\subset B$. The inclusions of punctured neighbourhoods factor asThe composite induces an isomorphism of fundamental groups, since both cone punctures are products of $X$ with intervals and their inclusion is a homotopy equivalence. The middle punctured ball has the homotopy type of $S^d$ and is simply connected for $d\ge 2$. Hence the composite is also zero on the fundamental group, forcing ${\pi }_1(X)=0$. This uses the nested neighbourhoods, not an unsupported claim that an arbitrary punctured neighbourhood is a sphere.

The Hurewicz theorem, applied successively to the vanishing lower homology groups, now gives ${\pi }_j(X)=0$ for $j<d$ and ${\pi }_d(X)\cong H_d(X)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. A representative of its generator is a continuous map $S^d\to X$ inducing an isomorphism in every integral homology degree. Topological manifolds have the homotopy type of CW complexes, so the homological Whitehead theorem makes it a homotopy equivalence. We have proved that $X$ is a homotopy sphere.

At this point the topological classification theorem is essential: the topological generalized Poincare theorem says that a closed homotopy sphere is homeomorphic to the standard sphere. Applying it completes the converse for $d\ge 2$. For $d=1$, the local calculation makes $X$ a connected compact one-dimensional manifold without boundary, hence a circle. For $d=0$, a compact zero-dimensional manifold is a finite set, and ${\tilde{H}}_0(X)\cong \mathbb{Z}$ forces exactly two points. Thus it is $S^0$. Altogether,The last classification step is not a consequence of homology alone, and we make no assertion of diffeomorphism with a prescribed smooth structure. If the word manifold allows boundary on both sides, the printed assertion needs this correction: the suspension of the interval is a closed disk. For instance $[x,t]\mapsto ((2x-1)(1-|2t-1|),2t-1)$ identifies it with the filled diamond $|u|+|v|\le 1$, although the interval is not a sphere.

To construct sphere maps of arbitrary integer degree, first use $h_m:S^1\to S^1$, $h_m(z)=z^m$ for any integer $m$, including the constant map when $m=0$. Lifting its argument to the real line gives $\theta \mapsto m\theta$, so the fundamental one-cycle is sent to $m$ times itself. Therefore $\mathrm{deg}{h}_m=m$.

Two cone neighbourhoods cover a suspension; their intersection admits a deformation retraction onto the original space. The reduced Mayer–Vietoris theorem gives a natural suspension isomorphismNaturality means that the suspension of a continuous map induces the same integer multiplier. This proves degree under suspension. Using the standard identification $S(S^k)\cong S^{k+1}$, setThus every integer occurs in every positive sphere dimension, with negative degrees handled just as well as positive ones.

If “every $n$” includes zero, that final printed assertion is false. The generator of ${\tilde{H}}_0(S^0)$ is the difference of its two points. A map of a two-point set is the identity, the transposition, or one of two constant maps, giving preciselyThese degrees of maps of the zero-sphere are the explicit exception to the arbitrary-degree construction.

Use integral homology throughout. The singular chain group $C_k(X)$ is free on the continuous maps from the standard $k$-simplex to $X$. Since the boundary operator preserves chains lying in $A$, these form a chain subcomplex. The relative chain complex and its relative homology areThe short exact sequence of chain complexes gives the long exact sequence in relative homology.

A sufficient hypothesis for the quotient comparison is a nonempty good pair: $A$ is closed and has an open neighbourhood $U$ which admits a deformation retraction onto $A$ while fixing $A$ throughout. A CW pair is another standard sufficient setting. These hypotheses hold for a simple closed curve in the surface here, using its annular collar neighbourhood. The induced quotient map $q:X\to Y=X/A$ collapses $A$ to a point $a$.

Here is the proof of the collapsing a pair theorem. Put $V=U/A\subset Y$. The deformation retraction makes $H_{\ast }(U,A)=0$, so the long exact sequence of the triple gives $H_{\ast }(X,A)\cong H_{\ast }(X,U)$. It also contracts $V$ onto $a$, giving $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong H_{\ast }(Y,V)$. Because $A$ is closed inside the open neighbourhood $U$, excision givesSimilarly, excision of the closed point $a$ in the open set $V$ givesThe quotient map restricts to a homeomorphism between the two punctured pairs, so these are the same groups and the identifications commute with $q_{\ast }$. Finally $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong {\tilde{H}}_{\ast }(Y)$, including degree zero. ThusThe neighbourhood condition is part of the result; the quotient assertion is not made for arbitrary bad pairs.

For the genus-two closed orientable surface with its chosen orientation, $H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1(X)={\mathbb{Z}}^4$, $H_2(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, with higher groups zero. The curve has $H_0(A)=H_1(A)=\mathbb{Z}$. Its relevant long exact sequence in relative homology isThe final map is an isomorphism because both spaces are connected. Consequently $H_1(X,A)=\mathrm{coker}{i}_{\ast }$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$; all relative groups above degree two vanish. The quotient topological space is connected, so its unreduced $H_0$ is $\mathbb{Z}$.

In the separating case, the curve is the oriented boundary of one of the two subsurfaces. Its homology class in $X$ is therefore zero, so $i_{\ast }=0$. The exact sequence becomesThe first sequence splits since its quotient is a free abelian group. Hence the homology after collapsing a separating surface curve isGeometrically, collapsing the boundary of each once-punctured torus fills its puncture with a cone on the circle, which is a disk. The quotient is a wedge sum of two tori at the collapsed point. Their two independent fundamental classes explain the extra second-homology generator.

In the nonseparating case, join the two new boundary components of the cut surface by an arc. Upon regluing, this supplies a closed curve meeting $A$ once transversely. The signed intersection pairing on an oriented surface therefore provides an integer homomorphism $H_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ taking $[A]$ to $\pm 1$. Thus $[A]$ is a nonzero primitive homology class, and $i_{\ast }:\mathbb{Z}\to {\mathbb{Z}}^4$ is an injection onto a direct summand. Its kernel is zero and its cokernel is ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$. The same exact sequence gives $H_2(X,A)\cong H_2(X)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. Therefore the homology after collapsing a nonseparating surface curve isAnother description starts from the genus-one surface with two boundary circles. Collapse those two circles separately to obtain a closed torus with two marked points, then identify the two points. Identifying two distinct points in a connected CW complex adds a loop up to homotopy, so this quotient has the homotopy type of $T^2\vee S^1$. The preceding relative homology calculation proves the groups without requiring that homotopy description.

Choose the Hopf map $\eta$ and orientations so its Hopf invariant is one. The cellular cohomology of $Y_d$ is $\mathbb{Z}$ in degrees $0,2,4$ and zero otherwise. Let $x,z$ be generators in degrees two and four. Precomposing $\eta$ with a degree-$d$ self-map of $S^3$ represents $d\eta$. The induced map of mapping cones is the identity on the two-cell and has degree $d$ on the four-cell. Since the Hopf mapping cone has cup square equal to its top generator, naturality of the cup product gives $x^2=dz$. Equivalently, precomposition scales the Hopf invariant by degree. HenceThe coefficient is $d$, not $d^2$: multiplication in ${\pi }_3(S^2)$ is being used, rather than postcomposition by a degree-$d$ map of the target sphere.

For $X=X_{d,f}$, the only nonzero cellular boundary is $C_4\to C_3$, multiplication by $f$. Thus its cellular cohomology givesLet $x$ again generate $H^2$, and let $z$ be the class of the four-cell cochain. Collapsing the three-sphere gives a map $X\to Y_d$ which pulls the degree-two generator back to $x$ and the degree-four generator back to $z$. Hence $x^2=dz$, now interpreted modulo $f$. Every other product of positive-degree classes vanishes by dimension. This is the cohomology ring of a Hopf attachment with a sphere summand. More explicitly, if $f\ne 0$,If $f=0$, there is additionally a generator $y$ of degree three, with $xy=y^2=yz=0$. The displayed description of the groups uses $\mathbb{Z}/0\mathbb{Z}=\mathbb{Z}$, so the zero case is included. In particular, a nonzero $f$ kills the degree-three cohomology but can leave torsion in degree four.

There are no one-cells, and attaching cells of dimension at least three does not change ${\pi }_1$. Thus $X$ is simply connected. The Hurewicz theorem in degree two gives

To compute ${\pi }_3$, choose a map $g:X\to {\mathbb{CP}}^{\infty }=K(\mathbb{Z},2)$ representing $x$. This Eilenberg–MacLane space can be realized by the classifying space of $S^1$. On $S^2$ the map is the standard inclusion; on $S^3$ it is constant, and it extends over the four-cell since ${\pi }_3(K(\mathbb{Z},2))=0$. Its homotopy fibre $T$ is the pullback of the universal circle bundle $S^{\infty }\to {\mathbb{CP}}^{\infty }$. The map on ${\pi }_2$ is an isomorphism, so the long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration gives ${\pi }_1(T)={\pi }_2(T)=0$ and ${\pi }_3(T)\cong {\pi }_3(X)$. Therefore the Hurewicz theorem identifies the latter with $H_3(T;\mathbb{Z})$.

Over $W=S^2\vee S^3$, the circle-bundle total space isThe first summand is the Hopf fibration total space over $S^2$, and the second is the trivial bundle over $S^3$. Their intersection is the fibre over the wedge point. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence gives $H_3(P)=\mathbb{Z}A\oplus \mathbb{Z}B$, with generators from the two three-spheres. These are the lifts of ${\eta }_1$ and $i_2$. The circle bundle over $W$ also has a 2-connected total space, so lifting and the Hurewicz theorem identify $d{\eta }_1+f{i}_2$ with $dA+fB$.

Over the attached four-disc the bundle is trivial. The resulting relative pair has the homology of $(S^1\times D^4,S^1\times S^3)$, so $H_4(T,P)=\mathbb{Z}$ and $H_3(T,P)=0$. Its boundary map sends a generator to the lift of the attaching map, namely $dA+fB$. The long exact sequence in relative homology now givesApplying Smith normal form to this one relation proves the third homotopy group of a Hopf attachment with a sphere summand:Since $d>0$, the greatest common divisor is positive even when $f=0$. This derivation uses the required map to an Eilenberg–MacLane space and determines the extension, rather than merely the orders of its pieces.

All groups in the first calculation have integral coefficients. Let $U=S^n\setminus j(W)$ and $V=S^n\setminus \mathrm{int}j(W)$. A two-sided tubular neighborhood of $j(\partial W)$ identifies $V$ as a compact manifold with boundary, with interior $U$. Pushing its boundary inward in a collar neighborhood gives a homotopy equivalence $U\simeq V$. After thickening across the same collar, excision identifies the relative groupsThe orientation of $S^n$ gives $W$ an orientation. The Poincare-Lefschetz duality isomorphism therefore givesEach component of $W$ has boundary: a closed component would have open image by the local embedding condition and closed image by compactness, hence would occupy the whole connected sphere, leaving no room for the components with boundary. In particular $U$ is nonempty, and $H^n(W)=0$.

Apply the long exact sequence in relative homology of $(S^n,V)$, using reduced homology for the absolute terms. Away from the top-dimensional homology of the sphere, it identifiesThe exceptional map iswhere $r$ is the number of components of $W$. Local compatibility of the orientations sends $1$ to $(1,\dots ,1)$, the relative fundamental classes of all the components. Its kernel is zero and its cokernel is ${\tilde{H}}^0(W)$. Thus the exceptional term has exactly the reduced form required, and all higher groups vanish. We obtain the Alexander duality formulawith negative-index cohomology zero. Ordinary degree zero is recovered byBoth formulas depend on the abstract manifold $W$, so they establish the requested independence up to group isomorphism. They make no claim that the complements themselves are homeomorphic or have isomorphic fundamental groups. The argument also covers $n=1$, when the diagonal map handles the degree-zero exception. This is the complement homology of a compact codimension-zero submanifold.

For the second calculation write $F={\mathbb{F}}_2$, $C=S^n\setminus i(M)$ and $c=n-k$. First suppose $c>0$, with $n\ge 1$. The rank-$c$ normal bundle has a mod-two Thom class, regardless of orientability. A tubular neighborhood, excision and the homological Thom isomorphism theorem identifyThe long exact sequence in relative homology becomes the Gysin sequence of an embedding:The map $\gamma$ takes the mod-two fundamental class of $S^n$ to that of $M$: restricting to each normal fiber evaluates the Thom class as $1$. Since $M$ is closed and connected, the degree-$n$ mapis an isomorphism. This cancels the exceptional top term and gives $H_i(C;F)=0$ for $i\ge n-1$ when $i>0$. In all the intervening degrees the sphere groups vanish. In degree zero, the remaining $F$ is removed by the augmentation. Consequently the mod-two homology of a submanifold complement iswhere negative-index homology of $M$ is zero. To recover ordinary homology, add one copy of $F$ in degree zero and change nothing in positive degrees. For $n=1$ the first range is empty, so the complement of a connected zero-manifold has the homology of a point. For example, codimension at least two gives $H_0(C;F)=F$, while codimension one gives $H_0(C;F)=F^2$ when $n\ge 2$.

If $k=n\ge 1$, an embedding of the closed connected manifold has image both open and closed in $S^n$, hence is onto; its complement is empty and all its ordinary homology groups vanish. The positive-codimension formula is not asserted in that case. The standard sphere calculations here assume $n\ge 1$; in ambient dimension zero the complement of the embedded connected point in $S^0$ is the other point.

Inclusion and passage to the quotient give a short exact sequence of chain complexesDefine the connecting homomorphism as follows. If $[c]\in H_k(K,L)$, then $\bar{\partial }[c]=0$, so $\partial c\in C_{k-1}(L)$. Since ${\partial }^{2}c=0$, it is a chain cycle in $L$, and we setChanging $c$ by a relative boundary or a chain in $L$ changes $\partial c$ by a boundary in $L$, so $\delta$ is well defined.

The resulting sequence isWe verify exactness directly. If a cycle of $K$ maps to zero in the relative homology, it differs from a boundary by a cycle in $L$, so it lies in $\mathrm{im}{i}_{\ast }$. If a relative cycle $[c]$ satisfies $\delta [c]=0$, then $\partial c=\partial \ell$ for some $\ell \in C_k(L)$; hence $c-\ell$ is a cycle in $K$ mapping to $[c]$. Finally, if a cycle $z\in C_{k-1}(L)$ becomes a boundary in $K$, say $z=\partial c$, then $[c]$ is a relative cycle with $\delta [c]=[z]$. The reverse containments follow immediately from consecutive composites being zero. This proves the long exact sequence in relative homology.

For the pair from part (c), every simplex of dimension below $n$ lies in $L_{n-1}$. Consequently the relative simplicial chain complex haswhere the degree-$n$ generator is the class of $[v_0\cdots v_n]$. Its relative boundary is zero because every codimension-one face lies in $L_{n-1}$. All differentials therefore vanish, andThis is the relative homology of a simplex and its boundary. Equivalently, the long exact sequence in relative homology, together with the fact that $|K_n|$ is a contractible space and the homology of a sphere $|L_{n-1}|\cong S^{n-1}$, gives the reduced homology identification $H_k(K_n,L_{n-1})\cong {\tilde{H}}_{k-1}(S^{n-1})$.

Let $T$ be the surface with boundary obtained by deleting the interiors of the $n$ disks. By excision,so $H_2(S,T)\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^n$ and the other relative groups vanish. In the long exact sequence in relative homology, the mapsends an orientation class to $(1,\dots ,1)$, up to an overall choice of sign. It is therefore injective and has cokernel ${\mathbb{Z}}^{n-1}$. Exactness gives $H_2(T)=0$ and a short exact sequenceThis sequence splits because its right-hand group is a free abelian group. Since $T$ is connected, we obtain

A relative cycle is represented by a singular chain $b$ whose boundary lies in $A$. Define $\delta [\bar{b}]=[\partial b]$. If a representative changes by $\partial c+a$ with $a\in C_n(A)$, its boundary changes by $\partial a$, an $A$-boundary. Thus the map is well-defined and additive. Its image is exactly the kernel of $H_{n-1}(A)\to H_{n-1}(B)$: a cycle in $A$ dies in $B$ precisely when it is the boundary of a relative cycle lifted to $B$. This proves the corresponding exactness in the long exact sequence in relative homology directly.

Map $X_{d,f}$ to $K(\mathbb{Z},2)={\mathbb{CP}}^{\infty }$ using its degree-two generator. The homotopy fibre is the total space of the corresponding circle bundle, is 2-connected, and has ${\pi }_3$ equal to that of $X_{d,f}$. Over $S^2\vee S^3$ its total space is $P=S^3{\cup }_{S^1}(S^1\times S^3)$, with $H_3(P)=\mathbb{Z}A\oplus \mathbb{Z}B$. The four-cell bundle is trivial; its relative degree-four generator has boundary $dA+fB$, the lifted attaching map. The long exact sequence in relative homology and Hurewicz theorem therefore give ${\pi }_3(X_{d,f})={\mathbb{Z}}^2/⟨(d,f)⟩$. Smith normal form gives the displayed expression when $d>0$, including $f=0$.