Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 12 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the curvature convention of the earlier curvature calculation. A geodesic variation of is a smooth map with such that every is an affinely parametrized geodesic. Its variation vector field satisfies the Jacobi equationIndeed by vanishing torsion tensor; differentiating in and commuting the covariant derivatives gives this equation. A Jacobi field is a field satisfying this equation. Conversely, any prescribed pair is obtained by smoothly varying the initial point and velocity of a geodesic; smooth dependence of the geodesic equation then constructs a geodesic variation on the compact parameter interval, whose variation vector field is the prescribed Jacobi field by uniqueness of this linear equation.
For continuous piecewise smooth vector fields along a curve along , the Riemannian index form is the symmetric bilinear formContinuity at the breakpoints is part of the admissibility condition; without it an arbitrary jump could destroy the claimed index inequality. The curvature symmetries make self-adjoint. For fields with zero endpoints, this form is the second variation of geodesic energy . More explicitly, twice differentiating energy, commuting and integrating the term by parts leaves the displayed integral; and fixed endpoints remove the remaining terms.
The endpoints and are conjugate points along when there is a nonzero Jacobi field with . Equivalently, the Riemannian exponential map at the initial velocity for this segment has singular differential: variations of initial velocity give precisely the Jacobi fields with zero initial value. For a unit-speed geodesic starting at , its cut time isIf finite and the geodesic is defined there, its endpoint is the Riemannian cut point along that geodesic. Before the cut time the segment minimizes, at that time it still minimizes by continuity, and every positive extension ceases to minimize. This is the Riemannian notion, independent of whether deleting the endpoint disconnects the space.
Let denote the continuous piecewise smooth vector fields along a curve with zero endpoints. The precise characterization at conjugate endpoints isThus Jacobi fields form the radical of the fixed-endpoint index form. For a smooth field , integration by parts givesA Jacobi field makes both terms vanish. Conversely, if for all tests, first take tests supported inside each smooth subinterval. The fundamental lemma gives the Jacobi equation on each piece. Integrating by parts piecewise then leaves, at an interior breakpoint , the term . The values of the tests there are arbitrary, so all derivative jumps vanish. The continuous field and its continuous first covariant derivative solve the smooth Jacobi equation globally, making smooth by uniqueness of its initial-value problem. In particular, conjugacy means that this radical is nonzero. Merely imposing is insufficient when the Riemannian index form is indefinite; a zero value of an indefinite quadratic form need not mean membership in its radical.
Now suppose there are no conjugate points on . In a parallel orthonormal frame along , write the Jacobi equation as , where the symmetric matrix represents . LetEvery Jacobi field vanishing at zero has components . The nonconjugacy assumption means is invertible for every , and hence the unique Jacobi field with the requested endpoint values isPut , so . Since solves the Jacobi equation, integration by parts gives and thereforeTo establish the needed strict positivity, use the Riccati factorization of the Riemannian index form. Differentiation givesand the initial data make this conserved quantity zero. Consequently is symmetric and obeys the matrix Riccati equation . For the components of ,Near zero, the differential equation gives and . Since is piecewise smooth and , , so . At time one the same boundary term vanishes because . Integration, including cancellation at all interior breakpoints by continuity, therefore givesIf equality holds, on each piece, so on . Continuity across the breakpoints gives with one constant vector ; and invertibility of force . HenceThe nonzero endpoint condition is compatible with this proof, but the minimizing property itself holds for arbitrary specified final value.
For the relation to the Riemannian cut point, let be the first conjugate time along a unit-speed geodesic, and let be a nonzero Jacobi field on vanishing at both endpoints. Necessarily , otherwise uniqueness of the Jacobi equation would give . Fix any later time for which the geodesic exists. Extend by zero to a continuous piecewise smooth field on . Then , while for any endpoint-vanishing smooth field ,Choose , using a smooth bump times parallel fields, so this equals . For small ,If a smooth variation is desired, smooth the single corner of this field while preserving the endpoints. The field and its derivative converge in the integral defining the Riemannian index form, so strict negativity persists. The second variation of geodesic energy then gives a fixed-endpoint path of smaller energy. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for paths on , with equality for the original unit-speed geodesic; the new path is therefore shorter. This proves loss of geodesic minimality beyond a conjugate point, and henceA missing conjugate time is interpreted as infinity. If a finite conjugate time exists and the geodesic continues past it, every later segment fails to minimize, so its first loss of minimality occurs no later than that conjugate time.
Finally, the cut-point dichotomy for complete Riemannian manifolds is the following characterization, stated without proof. On a complete connected Riemannian manifold, the cut time is the first time at which either the endpoint is conjugate to along the given geodesic, or a distinct minimizing geodesic from reaches the same endpoint with the same length. Thus a finite Riemannian cut point is either the first conjugate point or the meeting point of at least two distinct minimizing geodesics from the initial point; both alternatives may occur together. Completeness is the hypothesis guaranteeing that competing minimizing geodesics exist at a nonconjugate cut endpoint. It is not needed for the preceding local index-form argument on an existing segment.