Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 28 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , with normalized discrete valuations . Suppose first that is totally ramified, so . Choose a uniformizer of . The elements are linearly independent over : the nonzero terms in any proposed relation have valuations , distinct modulo , and a sum with a unique least valuation cannot vanish by the ultrametric inequality. Hence , proving .
Extend to an algebraic closure with values in . Every conjugate of has valuation , by uniqueness of the extended valuation on finite extensions of the complete field . In its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element , the coefficient is a sum of products of conjugates, counted with multiplicity. Thus for , so every nonleading coefficient is in . The constant coefficient is the product of all conjugates, so has valuation exactly one. This proves that is an Eisenstein polynomial. This argument also works for inseparable finite extensions, since the conjugates can be counted with their multiplicities.
Conversely let be an Eisenstein polynomial of degree , with root and . The Eisenstein criterion proves irreducibility. For completeness, monic factors would have integral coefficients; their reductions would be positive-degree powers of , so both constant coefficients would be divisible by the uniformizer of , contradicting . To determine the root valuation, put in the extended valuation. If , the leading term is the unique term of least valuation; if , the leading term again has uniquely least valuation zero. Both are impossible. If , every nonconstant lower term has valuation at least . Cancellation in therefore requires the leading term and constant term to have equal valuation:Since and is a positive integer, . The opposite inequality follows from . Hence , , and . We have proved both the equivalence and the uniformizer assertion:
Now take with and . The translated cyclotomic polynomial isIn characteristic , putting reduces this to . Its constant coefficient over the integers is . It is therefore Eisenstein at , of degree . Consequently is totally ramified of degree , with uniformizer . If , the field is simply , a trivial totally ramified extension.
For a general positive integer with , the field generated by the prime-to- root of unity is unramified. Indeed has distinct roots modulo . In a finite unramified field whose residue field contains those roots, Hensel lemma lifts all of them uniquely. Reduction preserves their orders: a prime-to- root reducing to one must itself be one, by Hensel uniqueness at the root one of . The arithmetic Frobenius therefore acts as , and the extension degree is the multiplicative order of modulo , with degree one when .
The identityfollows by taking powers of a primitive nth root of unity and using the coprimality of in the opposite direction. The prime-to- field is unramified and the -power field is totally ramified; unramified base change preserves total ramification proves that their compositum has the same residue degree as the prime-to- field. Thus the total ramification criterion for local cyclotomic extensions gives the full classification:This includes trivial extensions when . For only is possible.
For a finite totally ramified Galois extension with Galois group , define its lower ramification numbering byHere is the inertia group, which equals , and is the wild inertia group. For a uniformizer the condition is equivalent to . To justify this uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups, expand every as a convergent series with the coefficients chosen from representatives of in . Such an expansion is obtained by successive subtraction of a residue representative and division by , since total ramification gives . The automorphism fixes each , and is divisible by . Thus the required valuation bound for implies it for every , including the limit by completeness.
For , all primitive conjugates lie in and the Eisenstein degree is . HenceIf , put , so . The element is a primitive th root of unity. Applying the already proved uniformizer result to its field, and multiplying its valuation by the ramification index of over that field, givesThe identity automorphism has infinite valuation. Therefore the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension is explicitlyThe order of the middle group is . At odd , has order ; at , the condition is automatic, so when . The case has trivial Galois group, and the displayed formula remains valid. For all groups are trivial. The valuation calculation also provides the upper ramification numbering, if desired, by integrating the reciprocal indices with the Herbrand function; no change of numbering is implicit in the displayed answer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 24 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, with Galois group , normalized valuation , integer ring , and residue characteristic . The lower ramification numbering isThese higher ramification groups measure successively finer agreement with the identity. The group is the inertia group, the kernel of the action on the residue field. Each is normal in : conjugation permutes integral elements and preserves their valuations. The groups eventually become trivial, since each nonidentity automorphism moves some integral element and its displacement has finite valuation.
Let , the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension. Then is the Galois group of the residue extension, cyclic and generated by a Frobenius automorphism. For a uniformizer of , the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups givesTo see why one uniformizer suffices, the extension is totally ramified and its integer ring is . Elements of fix its coefficients. Differences of powers of are divisible by , so the valuation bound for implies it for every integral element. The converse follows by testing itself.
The tame inertia quotient is seen explicitly fromIt is a homomorphism because inertia acts trivially on the residue field, and its kernel is . Thus is cyclic of order not divisible by . For , the homomorphismhas kernel . Indeed composing two automorphisms adds the leading displacements, since and inertia fixes residue coefficients. Hence each is an elementary abelian p-group. Eventual triviality makes a p-group; the prime-to-p quotient makes it the unique Sylow subgroup of . This is the wild inertia group. Tame ramification means .
The filtration also measures the different exponent. For the totally ramified extension over , the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element of has polynomial roots , . The derivative formula givesFor a fixed , its displacement valuation is the number of indices for which it belongs to . Interchanging the finite sums therefore gives different exponent from ramification groups:The unramified part contributes zero. More generally different in a tower follows by taking products of bases of a module dual for the trace pairing, and givesThus a tame extension has different exponent , while nontrivial wild groups contribute additional positive terms.
The lower numbering restricts to subgroups: if , its groups are , directly from the definition using the same top-field valuation. Quotients need a different indexing. For real put and define the Herbrand functionThis upper ramification numbering stretches or compresses intervals according to the inertia indices. The quotient theorem says that for a normal subgroup , upper ramification groups commute with quotients:In particular the same upper index has a meaning compatible with passing to a smaller Galois extension, which lower indices generally lack.
For a tame totally ramified extension the picture is simple: , all with are trivial, and the different exponent is . The extension for odd illustrates this, giving exponent .
A mixed-characteristic wild family is the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension. Take with odd and . If and modulo , thenThe last equality follows because has order and its uniformizer valuation scales by the ramification index in that cyclotomic tower. The lower breaks are . Integrating the successive indices gives upper breaks .
In equal characteristic there is an equally explicit wild example. Start with and an Artin–Schreier extensionThere is no polynomial root in : a negative-valuation element has , while the right side has valuation . Adjoining a polynomial root splits the polynomial, whose polynomial roots are for , so the extension is cyclic of degree . The valuation equation forces total ramification, and . Choose with and set . Then is a uniformizer. For a nonidentity automorphism ,the first binomial coefficient is nonzero modulo , and all subsequent terms have strictly higher valuation. ThereforeThis is the ramification break of an Artin–Schreier pole. It shows concretely that wild breaks, unlike tame inertia, can occur arbitrarily far out in the filtration.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 21 3 ii a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Put , with . The shifted cyclotomic polynomial is Eisenstein at : its constant term is , and modulo it is . Therefore is totally ramified of degree and is a uniformiser.
The Galois group is , with . For , let , . Then is a primitive th root. Its difference from one is a uniformiser in the corresponding smaller cyclotomic field, and the relative ramification index is . HenceThe uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups now determines every group. Write , with . Then the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension isFor the middle range is empty and the extension is tame. The formula also includes ; then is already the whole group, so the first possible drop is later than in the odd-prime case. For , the entire extension is trivial.