For , put and use the positive-definite Lyapunov function . Its derivative is
For set . The brace divided by is , where , and . Since , . Completing the square gives its maximum
Hence . If , this sublevel region is positively invariant: decreases, and . The exponential bound makes . The trajectory is bounded in a compact ellipse, so smoothness of the vector field also guarantees existence for every positive time. Therefore
For the displayed strict inequality has no solutions; negative gives the same ellipse as . Taking the union of the nonempty ellipses is valid because each point needs only one Lyapunov certificate.
At the certified disk has squared radius . Along , the limiting threshold as is , which is strictly larger, since their difference is for . Choose strictly between these thresholds and then a sufficiently large finite . This point is certified by that ellipse but lies outside the disk. Thus the union gives a strictly larger certified region. It need not equal the whole basin of attraction.
Let denote the flow map generated by .
is nonpositive on .
The First Lyapunov theorem says that the existence of such a function makes the origin Lyapunov stable. To prove it, choose a sufficiently small closed ball . By compactness and positive definiteness,
By continuity, some satisfies whenever . Along a trajectory beginning in , cannot increase. Such a trajectory therefore cannot reach the sphere , where . Hence it remains in for every , which is Lyapunov stability.
The LaSalle invariance principle says that if a trajectory remains in a compact positively invariant set on which , then it approaches the largest invariant subset of .
For every , the wave has Orbital stability of a generalized KdV solitary wave in modulo translation: for every there is such that
The relevant stability slope has the correct sign because scaling gives
which is strictly increasing in precisely for . Together with the constrained variational characterization of , the conserved mass and energy provide a coercive Lyapunov function transverse to the translation direction.
Let be an equilibrium point of a dynamical system. A Lyapunov function on a neighbourhood of is a continuously differentiable function such that
and whose derivative along trajectories satisfies
The First Lyapunov theorem says that the existence of such a positive-definite proves Lyapunov stability of . If away from , the Second Lyapunov theorem strengthens this to asymptotic stability.
LaSalle invariance principle says that if a trajectory remains in a compact positively invariant set on which , then it approaches the largest invariant subset of
In particular, if that largest invariant subset consists only of , every trajectory in approaches .
A Lyapunov function for an equilibrium is a continuously differentiable function that is positive definite there and whose derivative along nonconstant trajectories is negative definite in a neighbourhood.
For , positivity requires , and
The quartic term is negligible sufficiently close to the origin, so is a local Lyapunov function exactly when
is positive definite. Its determinant condition is
The two roots of equality are
Therefore
For , a fixed point satisfies . It is Lyapunov stable when, for every , there is such that
A Lyapunov function on a neighbourhood of is a continuously differentiable function such that
The First Lyapunov theorem states that such a function makes Lyapunov stable. If away from , then is locally asymptotically stable.
To prove stability, choose a closed ball contained in the domain of . On its boundary sphere , compactness and positive definiteness give
Continuity at supplies such that implies . Along a trajectory, cannot increase. Such a trajectory therefore cannot first reach the boundary sphere, where its value would be at least . This proves Lyapunov stability.
If away from , take a sufficiently small compact sublevel set of . The LaSalle invariance principle says that every trajectory in it approaches the largest invariant subset of , which is just . Hence the equilibrium is also asymptotically stable.
A function near an equilibrium at the origin is a Lyapunov function if , for , and
The First Lyapunov theorem says these conditions imply stability. The second says that if the last inequality is strict away from the origin, then the origin is asymptotically stable.
To prove the first, fix a sufficiently small ball of radius . Positive definiteness and compactness give
Continuity at zero gives such that implies . Since cannot increase along a trajectory, that trajectory cannot meet the sphere , where . It therefore remains in the -ball for all forward time, which is stability.
Let and
Using the transformed equation,
Thus is a strict Lyapunov function away from equilibria.
On , , it decreases to its unique minimum at , where
then increases, crosses zero at , and tends to .
Take the regular radial solution with . In the transformed variables it satisfies
so . Since , the Lyapunov function immediately becomes negative. The trajectory cannot reach , where , and confines it below the positive zero of . Hence it remains positive and bounded for all .
The identity and the LaSalle invariance principle force the omega-limit set to consist of equilibria. The negative limiting energy excludes , leaving
Consequently
so . At infinity, , and
because . Thus .
A Lyapunov function is positive definite at an equilibrium when and for nearby . Thus is a strict local minimum of .