Birkhoff recurrence theorem 2026-10-14
Every continuous self-map of a nonempty compact metric space has a recurrent point. Choose a minimal subsystem. The forward orbit of every point in it is dense, and the same is true of every tail of that orbit; consequently each neighborhood is revisited at arbitrarily large times. A nonempty subsystem is all that is guaranteed: the identity map on a singleton has no larger subsystem.
Circle skew-product minimality criterion 2026-10-14
For a minimal dynamical system on a compact metric space, the continuous circle extension is minimal precisely when the displayed equation has no continuous circle-valued solution for any nonzero integer . A minimal subsystem of the extension has fibers that are cosets of its closed vertical translation stabilizer. If that stabilizer is proper, a nontrivial circle character trivial on it gives the forbidden equation. Conversely a solution makes a nonconstant continuous invariant function.
Dynamical proof of Hindman's theorem 2026-10-05
Extend a finite coloring of the positive integers to a point of a two-sided full shift. A minimal subsystem of its forward orbit closure, together with the proximal-minimal existence theorem, supplies a minimal point proximal to . Put . If all sums in , the augmented finite-sums set, have color in , their coordinate constraints define a cylinder set containing . The joint return lemma for a proximal minimal pair chooses a new positive term so that all new sums have color in both and . Mathematical induction gives an infinite monochromatic finite-sums set. The new term can exceed the sum of all previous terms, giving unique representations. The proximal-minimal existence theorem is a substantive input to this proof.
Minimal subsystem 2026-10-05
A minimal subsystem is a nonempty closed forward-invariant subset on which the restricted dynamical system is a minimal dynamical system. Every continuous map on a nonempty compact Hausdorff space has one: intersections of chains of nonempty closed invariant sets remain nonempty by compactness, so the Zorn lemma gives a minimal member.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 30 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A nonempty compact dynamical system is a minimal dynamical system if it has no proper nonempty closed forward-invariant subset. Equivalently, every forward orbit is dense: the orbit closure of any point is a nonempty closed forward-invariant set, and conversely a closed invariant set contains the orbit closure of each of its points.
Consider the collection of nonempty closed forward-invariant subsets of , ordered by reverse inclusion. Every chain has an upper bound, its intersection: the chain has the finite-intersection property, compactness makes the intersection nonempty, and continuity is not even needed for its forward invariance. The Zorn lemma supplies a minimal member , so is a minimal subsystem. Also is compact, nonempty and forward invariant, so minimality gives . Here the printed word “nontrivial” must mean nonempty; a singleton with its identity map shows that a subsystem with more than one point cannot always be required.
If , every tail of its forward orbit is dense in , since it is the orbit of . Therefore every neighborhood of contains for arbitrarily large . Choosing these times successively for balls of radii gives with . This proves the Birkhoff recurrence theorem: every continuous map of a nonempty compact metric space has a recurrent point. In fact every point of the chosen minimal subsystem is recurrent.
Write the continuous circle extension as the skew productA sufficient condition, and in this setting also a necessary one, is the circle skew-product minimality criterion: for every integer there is no continuous function such thatThe cocycle is assumed continuous; a merely measurable cocycle need not define this topological extension.
To prove sufficiency, choose a minimal subsystem of the extension. Its projection is a nonempty closed forward-invariant subset of , hence all of . For , vertical translation sends to another minimal subsystem, since it commutes with . Two such translates either are disjoint or coincide: a nonempty intersection is closed and forward invariant, so minimality forces equality. Define their common stabilizerThis is a closed subgroup of the circle group. Its closedness follows by taking limits of translations of points in the compact set , using both a translation and its inverse. Each fiber is nonempty. If , the sets and intersect at , so . Conversely translating any fiber point by any member of stays in the fiber. Thus every fiber is exactly one coset of .
If is proper, is proper and therefore finite, say for some positive integer . The character is constant on each fiber coset, giving a well-defined function from . This function is continuous: its graph is the continuous image of in , and projection of that compact graph onto the Hausdorff space is a continuous bijection and hence a homeomorphism. The relation gives , contrary to the criterion. Hence and the extension is minimal.
Conversely, a solution of the displayed equation makes a nonconstant continuous invariant function on the extension. Its nonempty level sets are proper closed invariant subsets, contradicting minimality. This also proves necessity of the circle skew-product minimality criterion.
Apply it with , , , and . The base is a minimal dynamical system: the closure of the cyclic subgroup generated by an irrational angle is the whole circle group, and its positive forward orbit has the same closure. To see the subgroup assertion, a proper closed subgroup of the circle is finite; if it contained an irrational angle it would be infinite. The elementary classification follows because a closed subgroup with arbitrarily small nonzero elements is dense, while otherwise its least positive representative generates a finite subgroup.
There can be no forbidden for any . Indeed, the winding number of a continuous closed path of equals that of , by translation and homotopy invariance of winding number. Consequently their quotient has winding number zero. But the proposed quotient has winding number . Thus the skew product is minimal. Starting at , induction givesbecause . Its orbit is dense in the two-dimensional torus, so its second coordinate is dense in the circle. Removing the initial point does not change density, since every orbit tail in a minimal dynamical system is dense. Therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 130 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The dynamical proof of Hindman's theorem gives the following result. The Hindman theorem asserts that every finite coloring of the positive integers admits an infinite strictly increasing sequence for which all nonempty finite sums of distinct terms have one color. We will in fact arrange , so all these sums also have unique representations.
Extend the given coloring arbitrarily to a point , retaining the prescribed colors at every positive coordinate. Let be its forward orbit closure under the left shift. The product topology makes a compact metric space, and the left shift is a continuous map. There is a nonempty minimal subsystem : order the nonempty closed forward-invariant subsets by reverse inclusion, use compactness and the finite intersection property to intersect any chain, and apply the Zorn lemma. Minimality also implies . The result permitted in the question now supplies a minimal point proximal to .
We need the joint return lemma for a proximal minimal pair, which we prove here. It suffices to consider an open neighborhood of in . Choose an open neighborhood of with . Every forward orbit in meets , and a finite subcover of on supplies a bound on the needed return index. For a compatible metric , choose smaller than the distance from to when the latter is nonempty. By uniform continuity of the finitely many maps , , some ensuresProximality supplies arbitrarily large with . To see that the times can be large under the definition using an infimum over , either , in which case this is automatic, or injectivity of the left shift makes every finite collection of distances strictly positive, so a sufficiently smaller proximal distance occurs beyond that collection. Some has . Then also. Hence arbitrarily large positive satisfyThis uses the minimal point property for bounded returns and proximality for closeness; closeness alone would not guarantee a return near .
Put . Inductively, let , where denotes the finite-sums set, and maintainThe initial condition at is just ; no condition on is required. The cylinder set is a neighborhood of . Use the proved joint return lemma to choose with both and in . All new sums belong to , and the old sums remain in , so both inductive conditions persist. Every nonzero sum is positive, where agrees with the original coloring. ThereforeThis proves the Hindman theorem using only the permitted proximal-minimal existence result and the compactness and return arguments supplied above.