Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 24 7 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An ultraproduct converts coordinatewise finite information into a single first-order structure. Let be nonempty structures in a common first-order language, and let be an ultrafilter on . In , setThe ultraproduct has these equivalence classes as its elements. Functions are interpreted coordinatewise; a relation holds of classes exactly when it holds on a -large set of indices. Intersecting finitely many large agreement sets shows that these interpretations are independent of representatives.
The Łoś theorem, which explains the construction's usefulness, saysHere is the proof. Induction on terms establishes the coordinatewise interpretation of atomic formulas. Finite intersections handle conjunction, and the ultrafilter property handles negation, since precisely one of a set and its complement is large. For an existential quantification, a witness class gives coordinate witnesses on a large set. Conversely, when the coordinate existential truth set is large, select a witness in each of those structures and a default element elsewhere. Its class is a witness in the ultraproduct. This uses choice. Structural induction on formulas now proves the theorem, with universal quantification obtained by negation.
Compactness. If every finite subset of a first-order theory has a model, take to be the finite subsets and choose . The cones for finite have the finite intersection property. Extend their filter to an ultrafilter by the ultrafilter lemma. For each , its cone is large, so the Łoś theorem makes the ultraproduct satisfy . This proves the compactness theorem, including theories of arbitrary set size.
Elementary extensions and nonstandard elements. An ultrapower uses a fixed structure at every coordinate. The diagonal map sending to the class of the constant function is an elementary embedding by the Łoś theorem. For a nonprincipal ultrafilter on , the class of in an ultrapower of the natural numbers exceeds every standard integer, because each corresponding tail is large. In an ultrapower of the real ordered field, the reciprocal of this element is positive and smaller than every positive standard reciprocal integer: an infinitesimal. These examples implement ordinary finite statements in a larger structure without claiming that every external subset or second-order assertion transfers.
Saturation. Such an ultraproduct over is countably saturated. To see the actual diagonal argument, list a finitely satisfiable type with parameters in the ultraproduct and fix representatives for those parameters. For each , the set of coordinates admitting a simultaneous witness to its first formulas belongs to by the Łoś theorem. Arrange that the decrease and put . The decrease, belong to , and have empty intersection. At coordinate , choose a witness to the first formulas, where is the largest with , or choose a default element if there is no such . For each fixed , on the large set . Therefore the resulting class realizes every formula. This proves countable saturation of an ultraproduct over omega; it does not assert saturation at all larger cardinalities.
Algebraic limits. Take finite fields indexed by the primes and a nonprincipal ultrafilter. Their ultraproduct is a field of characteristic zero: for every fixed positive integer , only finitely many primes divide , so on a large set. Every first-order sentence true in all finite fields holds in this infinite field, and more generally so does any sentence true for all but finitely many of the factors. This is a way to create an infinite field retaining uniform first-order information from finite fields. It does not make the field algebraically closed: the first-order sentence that every element is a square already fails in infinitely many of the factors.
Large cardinals. A countably complete ultrafilter gives a well-founded membership ultrapower of the universe. If it had an infinite descending chain represented by , each setwould be large. Countable completeness makes nonempty, giving an actual infinite membership descent at any index in the intersection, contrary to foundation. The Mostowski collapse therefore gives a transitive target and an ultrapower embedding .
For a measure on a measurable cardinal , every function with is constant on a large set: otherwise intersect the fewer than complements of all its fibres. Consequently fixes the ordinals below . The class of the identity function is below and above every constant class below , since all tails are large. Thus and its critical point is . Fine ultrafilters on that are normal ultrafilters on small subsets and kappa-complete yield the stronger embeddings witnessing supercompact cardinals.
These applications share a single principle: an ultraproduct preserves precisely the first-order information seen by its ultrafilter. Principal ultrafilters merely select a factor; nonprincipal ones can produce new sizes, elements and saturation. Existence of the needed ultrafilters and selection of coordinate witnesses are set-theoretic assumptions, and changing the ultrafilter may change the resulting model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 27 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A measurable cardinal is an uncountable cardinal carrying a kappa-complete nonprincipal ultrafilter on . An elementary embedding preserves all first-order formulas with parameters:For a measurable , the Łoś theorem gives an elementary map from the universe into its ultrapower. Countable completeness makes that ultrapower well founded, so the Mostowski collapse gives a transitive target and an ultrapower embedding . The least moved ordinal, its critical point of an elementary embedding, is : every function into an ordinal below is constant on a -large set by kappa-completeness, whereas the identity function on represents an ordinal above every constant ordinal below and below the image of . Conversely a suitably available embedding with critical point defines the measure .
The identity is elementary. In ZFC there is no nonidentity elementary class embedding , by the Kunen inconsistency theorem. Here the embedding is a class for which restrictions to sets and the critical sequence are available, as in the usual class-theoretic formulation. The axiom of choice is part of this conclusion; it is not a claimed contradiction for the choice-free Reinhardt-cardinal hypothesis.
Here is the stationary-set proof. A nonidentity has a least moved ordinal ; if all ordinals were fixed, induction on rank would fix every set. Put , and . Since fixes and shifts this sequence, . It therefore fixes the regular successor cardinal . The stationarity of ordinals of prescribed cofinality gives the stationary setUse the stationary partition at a successor cardinal to split into disjoint stationary pieces , merging pieces if necessary. Applying gives a partition of the same into stationary pieces. The additional piece is stationary.
The closure pointsform a club set. For unboundedness, repeatedly close a bound under the values of below it and take the supremum of the resulting countable sequence; regularity of keeps it below . Closure under limits is immediate. Choose and an increasing sequence cofinal in . Thenwhile every ordinal satisfies , so . There is an with . Since , elementarity gives , contrary to disjointness from .
Ultrapower embedding Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-11-05
For an ultrafilter on and a first-order structure , the diagonal mapsends an element to the equivalence class of its constant function. The Łoś theorem makes it an elementary embedding. The target is an ultrapower; it need not be well-founded. A Mostowski collapse is available only after well-foundedness and extensionality have been established.
For an uncountable cardinal , a -complete nonprincipal ultrafilter on gives a well-founded set-theoretic ultrapower of the universe, whose transitive collapse has critical point of an elementary embedding . Completeness makes every function from to an ordinal below constant on an ultrafilter-large set. Nonprincipality and completeness make the identity function's class lie above every constant ordinal below , forcing .
The uncountability qualification is essential. A nonprincipal ultrafilter on is only finitely complete and gives an externally ill-founded ultrapower of the natural numbers; it cannot produce a transitive elementary embedding with critical point .