Newman projection 2026-10-20
A Newman projection views a molecule along a chosen bond, showing substituents on the front atom and rear atom. It makes relative torsions visible without assuming that the two centres lie in the plane of a skeletal drawing.
A is the predicted major diastereomer. At the carbon adjacent to the ketone, take phenyl as the large group, vinyl as medium, and hydrogen as small. There is no adjacent heteroatom donor that would force a five-membered chelate. The appropriate first model is therefore the non-chelating Felkin-Anh model.
View along the carbonyl-carbon–stereocentre bond. Rotate to place the large alpha phenyl group approximately perpendicular to the carbonyl plane. Of the two resulting approaches opposite that large group, the favourable Bürgi-Dunitz trajectory passes nearer hydrogen rather than vinyl. Propyl transfer to the carbonyl and protonation of its oxygen give the configuration labelled A: in the printed projection the new OH projects forward and the propyl bond backward, while the original vinyl bond remains backward. Rotation used to construct a Newman projection must not be mistaken for inversion of the original stereocentre.
This is a relative-selectivity prediction, not a numerical product ratio. Simple attack on the face that happens to look less crowded in the initial flat drawing is unreliable because the relevant C–C single bond can rotate. B is the competing product from the less favourable approach beside vinyl. The model and its preference for the trajectory beside the small group are described in the institutional treatment.[ref]
Figure 1.
Original Newman construction of the preferred Felkin–Anh approach and the local stereochemistry corresponding to product A
. Details.
View the backbone along N–C to display in a Newman projection. The front amide nitrogen carries the preceding carbonyl and H, while the back C carries the next carbonyl, H and side chain. Rotation changes the contacts among these groups. A corresponding view along C–C displays . The peptide C–N bond itself is approximately planar and is not the freely rotating bond in either definition.
Figure 1.
Newman views of backbone torsions and the contrasting restrictions of glycine and proline
. Details.
glycine replaces the side chain by a second hydrogen. Removing C removes many contacts that exclude backbone arrangements for other residues, so its allowed region is much broader and includes substantial positive- space. Its alpha carbon is also achiral, so the steric map is approximately mirror-symmetric between positive and negative torsions in the simple isolated-residue model.
proline closes a five-membered ring from C through three methylenes back to nitrogen. In the N–C projection, the nitrogen's side-chain arm and C's C arm are tied together, preventing unrestricted relative rotation. Its is consequently confined near the usual negative- region rather than exploring the broad range of an acyclic amino acid. proline also lacks a backbone N–H donor when incorporated into an ordinary internal peptide. Ring closure restricts strongly, but does not freeze every backbone or ring degree of freedom. These differences are naturally represented by distinct Ramachandran plots; the original torsion/steric analysis established the basis for such comparisons.[ref]