Bloch equations 2026-10-18
The Bloch equations describe an ensemble magnetization with Larmor precession plus phenomenological recovery and decay:Here are model parameters, not a microscopic explanation of relaxation. The precession term follows from the torque on a magnetic moment; the two dissipative terms prescribe exponential decay. Bloch explicitly introduced this macroscopic relaxation description as a simplifying approximation.[ref]
Nuclear Induction by Felix Bloch. §4, pp. 467–468, equations (32), (37) and (38): longitudinal recovery and assumed exponential transverse decay
For positive and no transverse drive, rotates as : its signed rotation is negative about , although the resonance angular frequency is positive. This distinction prevents a hidden sign change when choosing a rotating frame.
Felix Bloch Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Felix Bloch developed the nuclear-induction description of nuclear magnetic resonance. A precessing transverse magnetization generates an oscillating magnetic flux and therefore a voltage in a surrounding coil. The signal provides direct access to the collective motion of nuclear magnetic moments. His equations include both precession in the applied magnetic field and relaxation toward equilibrium, connecting the coherent nuclear motion with the decay and recovery measured in an experiment.[ref]
Nuclear Induction by Felix Bloch. Physical Review 70, 460 (1946), nuclear induction and magnetization dynamics
A physicist.[ref]
Our History by Stanford University Physics Department. Independent professional profile
Portrait of Felix Bloch
. Stanford University Photographic Department / Courtesy Stanford University News Service. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported; Wikimedia VRT permission ticket 2008121710024441., via Wikimedia Commons. Source.Edward Mills Purcell, Henry Cutler Torrey, and Robert Vivian Pound placed paraffin wax in a capacitively loaded coaxial cavity near 30 MHz between magnet poles. Coupling loops supplied and extracted power; oscillating and steady fields were perpendicular. Output balanced against a generator reference fed amplification, detection and a microammeter. A slow field sweep revealed absorption above fluctuations at room temperature. Weak drive avoided population equalization. Calibration was rough; field inhomogeneity could contribute to linewidth.[ref]
Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid by Edward Mills Purcell and others. pp. 37–38, apparatus and results; weak drive, balanced cavity output, microammeter, field sweep, calibration and linewidth limitations
Two electrical routes to bulk nuclear magnetic resonance
. Original functional diagrams of the distinct instruments described above. Arrows show connections and field directions, not scale or winding geometry. Details.These are driven experiments with continuous radiofrequency excitation and changing static field, not demonstrations of modern pulsed Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance. Bloch's theoretical paper explicitly distinguishes proposed free precession after a pulse from the forced precession actually studied.[ref]
Nuclear Induction by Felix Bloch. pp. 460–461, introduction: proposed pulse/free-precession experiment versus performed forced-precession experiment
An experimental failure need not mean absent nuclear magnetic moments. In the model below, excessive drive reduces the population imbalance through nuclear magnetic resonance saturation; waiting too briefly can leave insufficient polarization. Separately, ordinary electrical losses can cause heating without identifying a nuclear resonance. The absorption experiment measured a balanced electrical signal, rather than using heating as its readout. Useful diagnostic checks include moving off resonance, changing the frequency, checking field uniformity and reducing drive. These are general checks; the historical operations actually documented are specified above.

