One-loop massive phi-fourth counterterms ($\delta m^2=\lambda m^2/(16{\pi }^2ϵ),\delta \lambda =3{\lambda }^2/(16{\pi }^2ϵ)$)

With interaction $-{\mu }^{ϵ}\lambda {\varphi }^4/4!$ and $d=4-ϵ$, the two-point tadpole diagram has symmetry factor $1/2$. The Euclidean massive loop integral gives its pole through $I_{d,1}=-m^2/(8{\pi }^2ϵ)+O(1)$. The three four-point bubble diagrams each have symmetry factor $1/2$, and the massive scalar bubble pole in four dimensions gives the quartic counterterm. The tadpole is independent of external momentum, so no one-loop wave-function renormalization is required. A vacuum-energy counterterm is additionally needed if vacuum diagrams are retained.

With interaction $-{\lambda }_0{\varphi }^4/4!$, the tadpole diagram has symmetry factor one half. After Wick rotation and a rotationally invariant Euclidean cutoff, its self-energy is $({\lambda }_0/2){\int }_{|k|<\Lambda }{d}^{4}k(2\pi {)}^{-4}(k^2+m_0^2{)}^{-1}$. The sphere area $2{\pi }^2$ and radial integral ${\int }_0^{\Lambda }{k}^{3}dk/(k^2+m_0^2)=\frac{1}{2}[{\Lambda }^2-m_0^2\log (1+{\Lambda }^2/m_0^2)]$ give the displayed shift. It is independent of external momentum, so no one-loop momentum-dependent wave-function renormalization arises from this graph. Different regulator schemes can treat power divergences differently while defining the same chosen pole mass.