Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 51 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For and initially , Schwinger parameterization and the supplied Gaussian integral giveSubstitute to obtain the Euclidean massive loop integralFor a positive integer , . Outside the convergence region this expression defines its meromorphic continuation, used in dimensional regularization.
Combine the two denominators with a Feynman parameter and shift by . This givesThe Gamma function has , and the remaining factors tend to and one. Hence the massive scalar bubble pole in four dimensions isThe pole is independent of the external momentum, as required for a local quartic counterterm.
Use the mostly-plus Minkowski metric and expand . The momentum-space Feynman rules are: an internal scalar propagator ; a four-scalar interaction vertex ; a momentum conservation delta function at each vertex; and per independent loop momentum. Divide by the Feynman-diagram symmetry factor. All momenta can be taken incoming. External propagators are omitted when computing an amputated one-particle-irreducible vertex.
The connected one-loop one-particle-irreducible Feynman diagrams are the two-point tadpole diagram and the three four-point bubble diagrams, in the channels. Each has symmetry factor . A tadpole attached to an external leg through a single bridge would be reducible, so is excluded here.
The Euclidean massive loop integral at has , so . Wick rotation and the propagator/vertex factors give the two-point loop amplitude , whose pole is . A mass counterterm contributes and cancels it when .
Each four-point bubble diagram has pole , with the external coupling-dimension factor restored in the local vertex. Summing its three channels gives the quartic counterterm . Therefore the one-loop massive phi-fourth counterterms are exactlyThere is no one-loop wave-function renormalization, since the tadpole is independent of external momentum. Vacuum graphs would additionally require a vacuum-energy subtraction.
In the minimal subtraction scheme, the bare coupling isIts dimension is ; the renormalized is dimensionless. Differentiate at fixed , writing :Solving through quadratic order gives the engineering term in a dimensionally continued beta function and the one-loop quartic scalar beta functionThe first term comes from the coupling's engineering dimension; the second is the quantum contribution to the renormalization-group beta function.
For fixed , the whole is not literally as : its linear term is present. Interpret the final instruction as keeping terms through quadratic order. Set . Then is an upward parabola, negative between its two zeros and positive above the interacting zero.
For positive initial coupling , the quartic running coupling below four dimensions follows by solving the linear equation for :If , then as and as . If it stays fixed; the zero solution also stays fixed. If , the infrared limit is still , but the ultraviolet evolution reaches a Landau pole at the finite scaleThus this branch cannot be continued physically to using the one-loop approximation. These are statements about the quartic coupling direction. The Wilson-Fisher fixed point of the full scalar theory also has a thermal relevant direction at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point; approaching the critical theory requires mass tuning. For negative initial coupling, the quartic potential is unstable: the same formula tends to zero from below in the ultraviolet and reaches a pole at finite scale toward the infrared.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 51 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
With , the logarithm is the connected generating functional. Its derivative is the mean field. The specified Legendre transform satisfies , and the quantum effective action generates amputated one-particle-irreducible vertices by further functional derivatives. In this question is the negative of the commonly used Minkowski effective-action convention; consequently its tree term is . Its diagrammatic content is unchanged if the convention is used consistently.
Expand the action around a stationary background in the presence of the source. For , integration by parts givesThe linear term vanishes at the tree-level saddle, . Keeping the Gaussian fluctuation approximation, and fixing the field-independent normalization, givesto one-loop order. The shift from the tree saddle to the exact mean field cancels from the tree Legendre transform at this order. Hence the one-loop scalar effective action in the question's convention isThe functional determinant has a Feynman i-epsilon prescription before Wick rotation. Higher loops come from the omitted cubic and higher fluctuation vertices.
To see the one-loop one-particle-irreducible Feynman diagrams, write . Its determinant expansion isEach trace closes a single scalar loop, with propagators and background insertions . No internal edge is a bridge, so these graphs are one-particle irreducible. Expanding the background factors produces their external legs.
For a constant , set . The quantum effective potential is defined here by . A plane-wave basis diagonalizes , and the supplied Wick rotation converts its correction per unit volume toHere the power of the renormalization scale keeps the continued integral in four-dimensional units. The Gamma function recurrence and expansion giveConsequentlyThe divergence is local, so subtract it with a potential counterterm. In the modified minimal subtraction scheme, remove its associated constants as well. The one-loop scalar effective potential becomesup to an arbitrary field-independent vacuum-energy constant. Another allowed finite subtraction replaces the nonlogarithmic constant. Restoring a loop-counting parameter would multiply the displayed correction by . The logarithm assumes positive curvature ; a background with negative curvature requires an analytic continuation and can have an imaginary part signalling instability.
The quartic case is special because of quartic closure of scalar effective-potential counterterms. If has degree at most four, then has degree at most two and has degree at most four: its pole is removable by the original polynomial couplings and a constant. For example, givesThe last two terms reproduce the one-loop massive phi-fourth counterterms, and the first is a vacuum-energy subtraction. A degree- potential with instead generates degree , forcing new operators. This is the potential-level manifestation of power counting in quantum field theory and four-dimensional renormalizability, even though the finite effective potential itself need not remain polynomial.

