Choose the phase of each inward-pointing ligand sigma donor orbital positive toward its own Mo centre. The eight donors then transform by site permutation. In the usual D4h molecular point group class order their characters are
Only and a chloride-containing vertical mirror plane leave ligand functions individually fixed. For example fixes the four donors at and exchanges the other four; the four fixed functions retain their signs.
Molecular character reduction gives
The dimensions sum to . Equivalently, take each square's four combinations: the all-in-phase pattern, the alternating x-versus-y pattern, and a two-dimensional pair. Combine corresponding patterns between upper and lower squares to obtain the six irreps above.
A ligand symmetry orbital can mix with a metal combination only if their irreps match. Since the donor levels lie below the metal levels, mixing produces a lower ligand-dominated bonding orbital and a higher metal-dominated antibonding orbital. In a two-level model with ,
The requested metal-dominated levels are shown in the right-hand column; the lower ligand-dominated partners are deliberately outside this diagram.
Figure 1.
Original qualitative effect of lower ligand sigma orbitals on the ten metal-dominated levels
. Details.
The lobes point directly at the chlorides, so their and combinations are strongly destabilized. The combinations can also interact through their equatorial density. The symmetries have ligand partners, so weaker shifts are symmetry-allowed; their local nearest-neighbour sigma overlap vanishes in the ideal planar geometry, making their shifts much smaller in that approximation. Symmetry allowance alone never sets an overlap integral's size.
There are no ligand sigma combinations of or symmetry, so the -derived delta pair is unaffected by the stipulated sigma-only mixing. In particular the low level survives while the other delta bonding channel becomes strongly metal–ligand antibonding. The plotted spacings and ordering of remote unoccupied levels are schematic; the robust conclusion is the four low Mo–Mo bonding orbitals separated from antibonding or strongly ligand-destabilized orbitals.
The ligand field leaves one low sigma bond orbital, two low pi bond orbitals and one low delta bond orbital. Their closed-shell occupation is
It requires eight metal d electrons, or four per Mo, hence Mo(II). With eight ligands, charge balance gives
Oxidizing removes an electron from a Mo–Mo bonding orbital; reducing populates a higher orbital with Mo–Mo antibonding or strong metal–ligand antibonding character. Thus the state has the particularly favourable filled bonding configuration in this model. This is an orbital explanation of a preferred charge, not a claim that charge alone determines solution redox stability independently of counterions or solvent.
The eclipsed geometry also follows naturally from the occupied delta bond: it aligns the four-lobed functions. Twisting the chloride squares toward a staggered geometry reduces this overlap and weakens that contribution to the quadruple bond.
Take the eight Mo–Cl bond-length changes as a stretching basis. These scalar coordinates have the same permutation representation as the eight sigma donors:
Infrared spectroscopy detects modes transforming as a dipole component: is and is . There are therefore two IR fundamentals, one and one doubly degenerate frequency.
Raman spectroscopy detects modes transforming as polarizability components. The relevant modes are , and , giving three Raman fundamentals, of which is doubly degenerate. The remaining stretch is silent in both ordinary spectra.
Thus the prediction is
The zero follows from infrared and Raman mutual exclusion: the molecule has inversion symmetry, dipole components are ungerade, and polarizability components gerade. This counts resolved fundamental frequencies of the ideal ion, not separate lines for degenerate components, isotope splittings or accidental numerical overlaps between distinct modes.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.