The radical of an ideal isWe first establish the properties needed below. If , every term of the binomial theorem expansion of contains either or , so . Also and . Thus is an ideal. The definition gives and shows that implies . Finally, if , then for some , so . Hence ; in other words, is a radical ideal.
We prove the stronger fact that the radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it:If and is a prime ideal, then for some , and repeated application of the definition of a prime ideal gives . This proves one inclusion.
Conversely, fix . The multiplicatively closed set is disjoint from . Consider the ideals containing and disjoint from . This collection is nonempty, and the union of any chain in it is another such ideal. By Zorn's lemma, there is a maximal member . It is proper because .
To prove that is a prime ideal, suppose but . Maximality forces both and to meet . Thus, for some ,Multiplication gives , since every term lies in , including . This contradicts disjointness from . Therefore is a prime ideal containing and avoiding . This proves the other inclusion, including the required prime ideal avoiding a multiplicative subset argument without using any unproved facts about the nilradical.
If , the displayed intersection represents as required. Conversely, an intersection of ideals that are all prime ideals is a radical ideal: if belongs to every one of them, then so does . ConsequentlyThe unit ideal is included by interpreting the empty intersection as .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.