A ring is reduced if its only nilpotent element is zero. Equivalently,The second expression says that its nilradical vanishes. A reduced ring may have zero divisors; for example, the direct product of rings is reduced but .
Write . Every element of the extension of an ideal is a fraction with and : a finite sum of such fractions has a common denominator and numerator still in the ideal . If , then , soConversely, let be a nilpotent element of the localization at a prime ideal . For some , . The vanishing criterion in a module localization supplies with . It follows thatso . Since ,This proves that the nilradical commutes with localization:The multiplication by is necessary: the numerator of a nilpotent element in a localization need not itself be nilpotent in .
If is reduced, its nilradical is zero. By b, every localization at a prime ideal has zero nilradical, so in particular is reduced for every maximal ideal .
Conversely, suppose every such localization is reduced. Take a nilpotent element . Then is nilpotent in every , hence zero there. To see directly that , suppose otherwise and consider the proper annihilatorChoose a maximal ideal containing this annihilator. The equality in would imply for some , by the vanishing criterion in a module localization. But then , a contradiction. This is the principle that localization detects zero elements. ThereforeThe argument also includes the zero ring, which is reduced and has no maximal ideals.
Let be the nilradical of . By b, the reduced locus of a ring isThe Noetherian ring hypothesis makes the ideal finitely generated; write . Fix . For every , the vanishing criterion in a module localization gives with . The product lies outside the prime ideal and satisfies . When , take .
For every prime ideal in the distinguished open setthe element is a unit in . The equality therefore implies , so is reduced. Thus , proving that is a Zariski-open subset of the spectrum of a ring.
More precisely, let , the annihilator of a module . The argument shows that if and only if some lies outside . HenceEquivalently, the complement is the support of a module . This is vanishing of a finitely generated module near a prime applied to : its finite generation lets the separately chosen denominators be combined into one element annihilating all of .
Set , a quotient module. The exactness of localization gives, for every maximal ideal ,If , the hypothesis makes this quotient module zero. If , choose . Its image in is a unit, so and the displayed quotient module is again zero. ThusFor completeness, if , its annihilator is a proper ideal, and hence lies in a maximal ideal . The vanishing criterion in a module localization shows in : any element annihilating lies inside . This contradicts the vanishing just proved. Hence , andThe use of localization detects zero elements is valid for every module; neither finite generation nor a Noetherian hypothesis is needed.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.