The printed bound also fails for the actual expectations. In the two-bin counterexample from part (b), at the true value and proposed bound areThe supplied premise does hold in this example: . Thus the problem is the invalid recurrence in part (b), rather than failure of the supplied starting estimate.[ref]
The intended mathematical induction is valid conditionally on the recurrence. For a deterministic nonnegative sequence satisfying and , the base case is . If , thenThis proves the proposed form for but cannot identify with .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
