A nonconstant polynomial is separable when it has distinct roots in a splitting field, equivalently when it is coprime to its formal derivative. For such , Bézout's identity for polynomials gives with . This identity remains valid over any extension . A repeated root would satisfy , giving the contradiction . Thus there are no repeated roots in any field extension. The argument in fact applies to every separable polynomial, whether irreducible or not.
For nonconstant irreducible , its greatest common divisor with is either or . Since when , inseparability is equivalent to . In characteristic ,
exactly when for every exponent not divisible by . Thus
No assumption that the coefficient field is perfect is required: vanishing derivative concerns the exponents, not whether the coefficients have th roots in .
Let . If is a separable algebraic element over , its minimal polynomial over divides the original separable minimal polynomial. It also divides , which has only one distinct root in any extension. Being separable with only one distinct root, that minimal polynomial has degree one. Hence and .
Conversely, if the degree- minimal polynomial over is inseparable, part (b) writes it as with . Then , so
The fields cannot be equal. This proves the equivalence
the separability criterion using a pth power.
Put , and . By the preceding separability criterion using a pth power, it suffices to prove .
Since is separable, . But , so . Consequently
Let and be the monic minimal polynomials of over and , respectively. Both divide its separable minimal polynomial over , so both are separable. Also in .
Every has . Hence has coefficients in and vanishes at , forcing in . Since remains a square-free polynomial over , this divisibility implies in . Together with , monicity gives . Therefore
The tower law makes . Part (c) now proves that is separable over . This establishes closure of separable algebraic elements under addition without presupposing that closure as a field theorem.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.