First interpret the surface integral through the given parametric surface, counting multiplicity. Set
Its derivative is
Using part (c), the fundamental theorem of calculus gives
On the other hand part (d), including its arc length factor, gives
and the corresponding expression for is . Subtraction proves
If , the parametric surface is injective on the rectangle, so this is exactly the stated surface integral over its image. It also remains the ordinary image integral at , since the repeated seam has zero surface area.
The assertion for arbitrary needs a multiplicity convention or the restriction . This omission is present in the native PDF. For example, take , , , . The image is the entire cylindrical band , since already covers a full turn. Its ordinary surface integral of Gaussian curvature is
But the difference of the two signed geodesic curvature integrals is . Thus ordinary integration over the image set makes the unrestricted assertion false. The boxed parameter integral is valid for all and and is the appropriate corrected statement. This distinction is the multiplicity of a parametrized surface integral.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.