First take . For , independence of the Bernoulli trials gives
For and , Markov inequality yields
Differentiate the logarithm of the right-hand side to minimize it. The stationary point satisfies
which is at least when . Substitution gives
When , use the limit , giving the trivial bound .
For , take . On we have , so the same Markov inequality gives the same expression. Its minimizing is now nonpositive, yielding the stated lower-tail bound. No rounding of is needed, because the exponential event inclusion holds for real thresholds. The cases and are deterministic and follow directly, or by the corresponding limits.
Write the bound in part (a) as , where the Bernoulli Kullback-Leibler divergence with natural logarithms is
For fixed , , its first derivative with respect to vanishes at , and
Integrating this lower bound twice, on either side of , gives the Bernoulli relative entropy lower bound . Apply the two tails from part (a) at and and use the union bound:
A tail with threshold outside is empty; thresholds at the endpoints follow by continuity of the bound. For the right-hand side is , so the assertion is immediate. This is the binomial form of Hoeffding inequality.
The sum of the first variables has distribution . For any fixed half-circle interval , put
The terms defining are independent Bernoulli variables of parameter , so and . Part (b), with , gives
There are at most cyclic intervals of length ; this also covers the non-wrapping interpretation in the question. They need not be independent, since the union bound always applies. Hence
With and natural logarithms, this becomes , which tends to zero for every . In particular,
The argument proves uniform half-circle balance for independent Bernoulli variables. It improves on separately bounding the two half sums by recognizing the difference as one centered binomial variable.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.