For on ,
The Itô formula, stopped in a compact annulus, therefore gives
This proves the local martingale property up to a possible hitting of the origin. For the annulus exit time , is bounded between and , so it is a true uniformly integrable martingale.
The exit is finite almost surely. Indeed is a martingale, so stopping at gives . Letting proves . Bounded convergence in the logarithmic martingale now yields
If is the probability of reaching radius before radius , continuity gives
Hitting zero before reaching radius would require reaching every positive radius first. Its probability is bounded by , which tends to zero as . Any finite-time path hitting zero is bounded before that time and hence hits zero before exiting some integer-radius disk. A countable union over those disks proves for every , almost surely. This is planar Brownian motion avoids a fixed point; it also makes a globally defined continuous local martingale.
To decide whether it is a true martingale, compute its expectation directly. Condition on if necessary and use rotation to take and write . Conditional on , the angle of is uniform. The angular average of a logarithmic potential is
For this follows by taking the real part of the convergent power series for : each nonconstant Fourier term integrates to zero. For factor out and apply the same argument to . The equality at one follows by the integrable limiting logarithmic singularity. All interchanges are valid: the shifted Gaussian density is bounded near the origin, where , and its Gaussian tail controls logarithmic growth.
The radius has density . Consequently, for ,
Since , is not a martingale, despite integrability at each deterministic time. This is the logarithmic radius of planar Brownian motion example.
The optional hint is consistent with this conclusion. The upper-radius exit is finite and never occurs at zero. After that exit the stopped square is ; before it, a radius in also gives a logarithmic square no larger than , while a radius below contributes precisely the extra indicated term. This proves the hinted inequality without assuming that the unstopped process is a true martingale.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.