Let , with finite offspring mean . Conditioning on the original cell's first exponential lifetime gives
Each of its offspring starts an independent copy of the process, which explains the factor . Changing to and differentiating yields , . Hence
Finite-mean truncation and this integral bound justify finite expectations and exclude explosion in finite time; it is not necessary to assume a bounded offspring count.
For the probability generating function, let . Independence of offspring populations gives the conditional generating function at a first division time. Thus
and differentiation of the changed-variable integral proves
For , the integrand is bounded, so this generating-function argument has the needed convergence even without higher offspring moments.
With two offspring always, the backward equation becomes . Separation and the initial value give
Thus is geometric on the positive integers, and
This is a Yule process shifted down by one. It is not an inhomogeneous Poisson process. Given , its instantaneous jump rate is , a state-dependent random rate rather than a deterministic function of time. Also whereas , unequal to the mean for . Its mean arrival intensity does not turn its dependent increments and geometric marginals into Poisson ones.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.