Write and assume . The large-deviation speed is , and the answer is
Here and below a large deviation principle at speed means the open-set lower bound and the closed-set upper bound . The displayed rate function is nontrivial and is a good rate function.
For , the exponential distribution gives
Shrinking an interval about any supplies the local lower bound ; neighborhoods of zero have probability tending to one. Every open set intersecting the nonnegative half-line contains one of these neighborhoods, giving the open-set bound. If a closed set contains zero, its upper bound is just . If it meets but excludes zero, closedness gives , and . A closed set disjoint from the support has probability zero. This proves the full large deviation principle, including the boundary at zero.
The fixed exponential tail explains the speed: an excursion of size costs . The full Gärtner–Ellis theorem is unnecessary here; the limiting cumulant-generating function is flat on and infinite at , so it fails the theorem's essential smoothness hypothesis.
Assume ; otherwise the scaled sum is deterministic and no nontrivial rate function is possible. The sum has normal distribution . For , use the faster large-deviation speed . The moment-generating function of a normal distribution yields
The limiting cumulant-generating function is finite and differentiable on all of , hence satisfies the Gärtner–Ellis theorem. Its Legendre-Fenchel transform is obtained by maximizing , whose maximizer is . Thus
The drift disappears because the scaled mean is . The rate function is nontrivial and good. The corrected scaled cumulant-generating function used here contains an expectation; the corresponding formula in the paper's reference material omits it.
Use the large-deviation speed from part (a). For every , the Chernoff bound for a normal distribution gives, for all sufficiently large ,
Consequently
because the exponent has order , exceeding by a factor . Thus and satisfy exponential equivalence. This conclusion does not require independence between and , since their difference is exactly .
The exponential equivalence theorem transfers the large deviation principle and its good rate function, giving
Large positive excursions are cheapest through the single exponential random variable; a negative excursion would require the Gaussian random variable sum to move on its faster scale. If , the deterministic shift gives the same conclusion directly.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.