On the coexistence fixed point hasFor these give a nonreal conjugate pair on the unit circle. Nearby, while the pair remains complex, its modulus is ; increasing through one changes the modulus from greater than one to less than one. This is the candidate Neimark–Sacker bifurcation, and a nonlinear coefficient is needed to decide its direction.
Here that coefficient can be calculated explicitly. Let , , and normalize the right eigenvector and complex projection byFor deviations , the quadratic derivative isThus , and are the quadratic coefficients in . The quadratic coordinate change hasSubstitution into the map and collection of yieldsUsing and simplifies the cubic radial coefficient of a quadratic planar map toConsequently, away from strong resonances of a planar map, the bifurcation is supercritical: on coexistence is attracting, whereas on a small attracting invariant closed curve surrounds the unstable coexistence fixed point. If , its leading radius is , and its radial multiplier is . Motion on the curve can be quasiperiodic or frequency-locked into periodic motion; stability of the curve alone does not imply an irrational rotation.
Two interior values need qualification: is a 1:3 resonance, and is a 1:4 resonance. At the former is singular and the quadratic term must be retained. At the latter a cubic term remains. The resonant terms can be displayed explicitly in the same normalization. At , . The third iterate, near the resonance and after removing nonresonant quadratics, hasHere is the angular detuning. Its nonzero stationary solutions have and three phases; they constitute a saddle three-cycle. Indeed the two leading real exponents at these solutions are , of opposite signs. Therefore no ordinary attracting-circle conclusion follows arbitrarily close to the exact 1:3 point.
At , the cubic resonant normal form isThe extra coefficient follows from and . Its radial cubic damping is uniform since . The slow angular equation is , so fourfold phase locking must be considered. For example, varying at fixed gives . The locked branches satisfy and . For they form one attracting and one saddle four-cycle; the two branches alternate in phase. This is a resonant alternative to quasiperiodic motion on an invariant curve. The endpoints also fail the simple-complex-pair assumptions. This distinguishes the generic nearby dynamics from unjustified claims about every point on the printed interval.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.