We use the random alteration method, controlling large hypergraph independent sets and then removing the few forbidden overlaps. Fix , let tend to infinity, and independently include each three-element subset of an -vertex set as an hypergraph edge with probability . Call the resulting three-uniform hypergraph , and let .
For any prescribed -vertex set, the probability that it is a hypergraph independent set is . Hence the union bound gives
because has order , with a positive constant depending only on .
Let count unordered pairs of distinct hypergraph edges meeting in two vertices. Each potential pair consists of its common pair and two distinct additional vertices, so
The Markov inequality implies . We may therefore fix one realization for which and no -vertex hypergraph independent set exists. For each offending hypergraph edge pair choose one vertex from its union, and let be the set of all chosen vertices. Delete , together with all incident hypergraph edges, and call the induced hypergraph . Then , so . The next two parts verify both desired properties of this same .
Every hypergraph independent set in the induced hypergraph is also a hypergraph independent set in . Thus its maximum independent-set size is at most . In any proper hypergraph colouring with at most colours, one colour class would have at least vertices, contradicting that bound. Therefore
This is the weak hypergraph colouring convention: an hypergraph edge may use two colours, but it may not be monochromatic.
If two distinct hypergraph edges survived in and shared two vertices, they were an offending pair in . The deletion set contains a chosen vertex from their union, so at least one of those hypergraph edges could not have survived. This contradiction proves that is a linear hypergraph. Deleting vertices leaves every surviving hypergraph edge of size three, so the construction meets the uniformity requirement as well as the chromatic-number requirement.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.