Denote the normalized initial field by , and its shifted packets byHere the photon-number kets are orthogonal Fock states. Counting shared number labels givesAfter the interaction, linearity gives the joint stateTake the partial trace over the field. Put and . In the ordered qubit basis , the reduced density matrix isFor example, its upper off-diagonal entry is half the overlap of the field accompanying with the field accompanying , fixing the conjugation order. The trace is one, and positivity follows because this is the partial trace of a normalized pure state. For , ; at it is zero, not the continuation . This is the photon-number reference for a Hadamard gate channel, not an actual coherent-state packet.
The desired output is . To evaluate its squared quantum fidelity, write the input Bloch vector as , with , and . The desired vector after the Hadamard is . From part (a), the actual vector isFor this simplifies to . The pure state overlap is one half of one plus the dot product with the desired unit vector, soSince , . Therefore the infidelity is uniformly bounded by , and the entanglement effect on the implemented gate is negligible for large , uniformly over all initial pure states. The shifted field packets then have overlaps tending to one, so they retain negligible information about the qubit transitions. A large fixed photon number without this broad number coherence would not suffice.
The printed overlap silently requires . If the allowed packet has , the exact result instead isFor instance, and give actual overlap , whereas substituting into the printed expression gives . This boundary correction follows directly from the two-shift overlap above.
Use the rotation-invariant distribution over pure initial states, namely the uniform pure-qubit average with area element . Reflection symmetry gives , and rotational symmetry together with gives . Averaging the squared quantum fidelity from part (b) therefore yieldsIf the single-number packet is included, its corrected average isUniform polar angle without the sine weight would not be the Haar-uniform average over all pure qubit states.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.