Use and the WKB approximationAt leading order, the divergence-form acoustic Helmholtz equation becomes . The sloping-wall Neumann boundary condition becomes at . In the even transverse family this has normal modes , where , andFor the right-going propagating branch take real positive . The displayed local expression in the question must be read as a frozen-coefficient shorthand: the actual slowly varying phase is . Differentiating would instead give the erroneous local wavenumber .
The symmetric duct also has odd transverse normal modes . The integer-cosine form selects the even family requested here, rather than representing every duct mode. The approximation requires smooth slow variation and a positive separated from cutoff; it fails in a cutoff transition.
Let , , and . At the next order of the WKB approximation, the transverse operator givesThe moving-wall Neumann boundary condition gives and . Multiply by and integrate across the duct. Since and at both walls, integration by parts givesAlso , because at both walls. Substituting these identities in the next-order equation produces the transport equation for the variable-sound-speed WKB duct amplitude:Consequently is a complex constant, including a constant phase. For , ; for , , with the factor two absorbed into the mode's arbitrary constant. ThusEquivalently,There is an independent flux check. The real-coefficient Helmholtz equation implies , and the wall condition gives zero normal flux. Hence the integrated longitudinal current is constant; at leading order it is . This agrees with the transport equation. The factor must be retained: using only would ignore the variable coefficient in the given divergence-form equation.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.