Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2007 / iii / Paper 67 / 4

A complete Einstein ring requires an axisymmetric gravitational lens and exact alignment of the source with the lens centre and observer: $\beta =0$. A finite aligned circular source gives a ring of finite width. The background source must lie behind the lens, so the lensing distance factor is positive.

With $\beta =0$ the thin gravitational lens equation givesThe Einstein radius here is angular, and the mass is projected inside the corresponding aperture. For an extended mass distribution the equation is implicit because the enclosed mass depends on ${\theta }_E$.

Using the supplied approximations, $D_{ds}/(D_s{D}_d)=1/(3\times 10^{25}\mathrm{m})$ and ${\theta }_E=3\times 10^{-4}$, the inferred mass isThusThis measures the projected aperture mass without requiring the singular isothermal sphere model used subsequently.

For the singular isothermal sphere, integrate its projected surface mass density inside a circle of proper radius $\xi$:With $\xi =D_d\theta$ this gives the reduced deflection magnitudeindependent of $\theta$. Hence the singular isothermal sphere lens hasThe spherical three-dimensional mass $2{\sigma }^{2}r/G$ would give the wrong coefficient here; the thin gravitational lens equation needs the projected cylindrical mass.

Using the same ${\theta }_E=3\times 10^{-4}$ and $D_{ds}/D_s=0.5$, the one-dimensional velocity dispersion isThus $\sigma \simeq 2100\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ within the idealized SIS model.

Choose a signed angular coordinate along the source-lens line. The singular isothermal sphere lens equation isFor $\beta >0$, the positive image is ${\theta }_{+}=\beta +{\theta }_E$. A negative image would require ${\theta }_{-}=\beta -{\theta }_E<0$, which is possible only for $\beta <{\theta }_E$. Here $\beta =4$ arcmin and ${\theta }_E=1$ arcmin, so there is only one image, at $\theta =5$ arcmin. Formally using the negative-image formula would produce a positive value, inconsistent with the branch from which it was obtained.

The paper defines its vector deflection as source minus image angle, ${\mathbf{\alpha }}_{\mathrm{paper}}=(\beta -\theta )\hat{\mathbf{\theta }}$. This is the negative of the usual reduced deflection in $\mathbf{\beta }=\mathbf{\theta }-{\mathbf{\alpha }}_{\mathrm{standard}}$. Therefore its relation to lensing convergence isFor the SIS, ${\mathbf{\alpha }}_{\mathrm{paper}}=-{\theta }_E\hat{\mathbf{\theta }}$. The two-dimensional polar-coordinate divergence givesUsing a plus sign with the printed inward deflection would incorrectly give negative convergence.

For a small intrinsically circular source, differentiate the thin gravitational lens equation. The radial and tangential source-image Jacobian matrix eigenvalues areThus the image is stretched tangentially around the lens centre, with no radial stretch in this idealized model. At $\theta =5$ arcmin, ${\lambda }_t=4/5$; the image is an ellipse with tangential-to-radial axis ratio $5/4$. It is not a complete ring. This local description assumes a source small enough that the Jacobian is nearly constant across it.

The signed lensing magnification isSince the lensing shear magnitude equals $\kappa$, it reduces to $\mu =(1-2\kappa {)}^{-1}$. At the image, $\kappa ={\theta }_E/(2\theta )=1/10$, henceThe image has positive parity and is $25\%$ brighter for the same intrinsic source. Gravitational lensing preserves surface brightness, so this flux amplification follows from its larger apparent solid angle. In evaluating the convergence, use the image angle $5$ arcmin, not the source angle $4$ arcmin.

Cosmic shear is the small, statistically correlated distortion of distant galaxy images by weak gravitational lensing from intervening large-scale matter inhomogeneities. An individual galaxy has an unknown intrinsic shape, so the signal is measured through ensemble shape correlations rather than by assuming every source is circular. The angular and redshift dependence of these correlations probes the projected matter fluctuations, their growth and the angular diameter distance relation, constraining dark matter, cosmological density parameters and dark energy. Gravitational lensing responds to all gravitating matter rather than just luminous tracers. Intrinsic alignments and shape-measurement biases must be modeled separately from the lensing signal; the physical and statistical basis is described in arxiv.org/abs/1411.0115 .