A Hadamard space is a complete CAT(0) space. A useful equivalent definition, which makes the remaining assertions consequences rather than assumptions, is a complete metric space in which every pair has a midpoint , with , satisfying
This is the nonpositive-curvature midpoint inequality. Euclidean Hilbert spaces satisfy it with equality in the parallelogram formula. The comparison argument in (c) shows that this definition gives the usual CAT(0) triangle condition.
Write . If is any other metric midpoint, apply the inequality from (a) to the chosen midpoint with . The right side is , so . Every pair has a unique midpoint.
Choose successive midpoints to define on all dyadic parameters. Consecutive points at level have distance . The triangle inequality gives for dyadic . Conversely,
which gives the reverse bound. Thus equality holds. Completeness extends this map uniquely and continuously to , retaining . It is a constant-speed geodesic.
Every other geodesic has the same midpoint, and then the same successive midpoints, so agrees on all dyadic parameters. Continuity gives agreement everywhere. Hence
The comparison triangle must have third side : the printed contains an undefined . Use , and .
First extend the midpoint inequality along any constant-speed geodesic from to . If , the function is midpoint-convex by (a). Iteration proves its convexity bound for dyadic , and continuity then gives the Hadamard squared-distance inequality
Apply this first to with , and then to with :
Simplification gives
In a Euclidean comparison triangle, the cosine rule gives the scalar product of the two vectors from the common vertex as . The squared distance between their multiples and is exactly the right side displayed above. Taking nonnegative square roots proves the required triangle comparison, including degenerate Euclidean triangles.
Let lie in the closed ball of center and radius . On their unique geodesic, the Hadamard squared-distance inequality gives
Thus every point of that geodesic lies in the ball. By uniqueness there are no other geodesics to consider, so every closed ball is geodesically convex.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.