Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2008 / iii / Paper 28 / 4

A congruent number is a positive integer which occurs as the area of a right triangle with positive rational side lengths. Scaling a triangle by a nonzero rational factor multiplies its area by a rational square, so the essential parameter is its positive square class; integer parameters can be reduced to square-free integers. For example $6$ is congruent by the triangle $(3,4,5)$, and $5$ is congruent by $(3/2,20/3,41/6)$.

The connection with elliptic curves comes from the congruent number elliptic curve in the modelFrom a rational point with $y\ne 0$, defineDirect squaring gives $a^2+b^2=c^2$, and its area isConversely, from a positive rational triangle $(a,b,c)$ of area $N$, putSubstitution using $c^2=a^2+b^2$ and $ab=2N$ gives $y^2=x^3-N^{2}x$ and $y\ne 0$. ThusThe standard rational torsion of a congruent number curve consists of $O,(0,0),(N,0),(-N,0)$. One way to see the torsion restriction is to use good primes $p\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$. The character sum cancels at $x$ and $-x$, giving $\#E_N({\mathbb{F}}_p)=p+1$. For any odd prime $\ell$, the Dirichlet theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions supplies good primes with $p\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$ and $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}\ell )$, so the reduction of torsion points on an elliptic curve excludes $\ell$-torsion. Good primes $p\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}8)$ similarly bound the two-primary torsion by four, and the four displayed points give equality. Consequently the Mordell-Weil theorem turns the criterion into positive rank of $E_N(\mathbb{Q})$. Arithmetic two-descent on an elliptic curve and local obstructions are therefore tools for the congruent number problem, and a nontorsion point gives infinitely many rational right triangles from a nontorsion point by taking multiples.

We now give elementary proofs for $1$ and $2$, including the descent steps. Recall the primitive Pythagorean parametrizationwhere $m>n>0$ are coprime and of opposite parity. To derive it, in a primitive Pythagorean triple put the even leg at $A$. The relatively prime integers $(C+B)/2,(C-B)/2$ have product $(A/2{)}^2$, so each is a square, say $m^2,n^2$. This gives the formulas and the parity condition. The area is $mn(m-n)(m+n)$, and its four factors are pairwise coprime: their common divisors reduce to divisors of $m,n$ or of two, while $m\pm n$ are odd.

Area one is impossible. Clearing denominators of a hypothetical rational triangle of area one gives an integer triangle with square area. Dividing out its common factor leaves a primitive integer triangle whose area is still a rational square; an integer which is a rational square is an integer square. Choose such a triangle with smallest hypotenuse. Pairwise coprimality in the area product forcesThe positive integers $u,v$ are odd and coprime. If $m$ were even, then $n$ would be odd and $u^2-v^2=2s^2$ would be $2$ modulo eight, whereas two odd squares have difference zero modulo eight. Hence $m$ is odd, $n$ is even and $s$ is even.

Now set $a=(u+v)/2$ and $b=(u-v)/2$. These are positive coprime integers andThus $(a,b,r)$ is another integer right triangle with square area and hypotenuse $r$, strictly smaller than $m^2+n^2$. This contradicts the minimal choice and proves the Fermat right triangle theorem. In particular $1$ is not a congruent number.

For area two we first establish the auxiliary descent fourth-power sum cannot be a square. Suppose $x^4+y^4=z^2$ with positive integers, and choose a primitive solution with smallest $z$. Two odd fourth powers sum to $2$ modulo sixteen, so after exchange $x$ is odd and $y$ is even. Parametrize the primitive triangle $(x^2,y^2,z)$:The case $m$ even, $n$ odd makes $x^2\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$, so $m$ is odd and $n$ even. Coprimality then gives $m=u^2$ and $n=2v^2$. ConsequentlyThis second triangle is primitive, since $x$ is odd and $\gcd (x,v)=1$. Parametrize it as $x=r^2-s^2$, $2v^2=2rs$, $u^2=r^2+s^2$, with $r,s$ coprime. The equality $v^2=rs$ makes $r=a^2$, $s=b^2$. Thusa new positive solution with smaller hypotenuse $u<z=u^4+4v^4$. This contradicts infinite descent, proving the auxiliary assertion.

Area two is also impossible. Clearing denominators and removing a common factor now gives a primitive integer triangle with area twice an integer square. Indeed, if an integer is $2(a/b{)}^2$ with $\gcd (a,b)=1$, then $b^2$ divides two, forcing $b=1$. Its area product would satisfyThe odd factors must be squares and the unique even factor twice a square. As in the preceding modulo-eight argument, $m$ even would force $m+n=c^2$, $m-n=d^2$ and $n=b^2$ odd, with $c^2-d^2=2b^2$, impossible modulo eight. ThusThe integers $u=(c+d)/2$ and $v=(c-d)/2$ are positive and coprime, and $uv=(c^2-d^2)/4=b^2$. Hence $u=r^2$, $v=s^2$. Butcontradicting the auxiliary descent. This proves two is not a congruent number, and concludesThe two obstructions are global arithmetic descents. The elliptic-curve correspondence organizes the wider problem, but by itself is not a substitute for proving these particular nonexistence assertions.

Let $K$ be a field, $K_s$ a separable closure and $G_K$ its absolute Galois group. A discrete Galois module $A$ is an abelian group with a continuous $G_K$-action, so each element has an open stabilizer. Galois cohomology uses continuous cochains. Its zeroth group is $H^0(K,A)=A^{G_K}$, and its first group iswhereThus cocycles measure a failure of descent, and coboundaries account for changing a chosen lift. A short exact sequence of Galois modules gives a long exact sequence in group cohomology. Its connecting map sends an invariant element of a quotient to the cocycle $\sigma b-b$ of a chosen lift $b$; changing the lift changes this by a coboundary. These constructions provide the bridge between arithmetic divisibility and cohomology.

For Kummer theory, assume the characteristic does not divide $n$. The multiplicative exact sequence isThe final arrow is surjective because a root of $T^n-a$ is separable for $a\ne 0$. Hilbert's theorem 90 says $H^1(K,K_s^{\times })=0$. Here is its usual finite-extension proof. For a multiplicative cocycle $c_{\sigma }$ on a finite Galois extension $L/K$, choose $a\in L$ so thatSuch an $a$ exists by the Artin independence theorem. The cocycle identity gives $\tau A=c_{\tau }^{-1}A$. With $b=A^{-1}$ this becomes $c_{\tau }=\tau b/b$, a coboundary. Every continuous cocycle with values in $K_s^{\times }$ is defined over a sufficiently large finite Galois extension, so the same result holds for the absolute group.

The long exact sequence in group cohomology now givesThe class of $a$ maps to $c_{\sigma }=\sigma (\alpha )/\alpha$, where ${\alpha }^n=a$. This cohomological statement does not require ${\mu }_n\subset K$; it retains the actual Galois action on ${\mu }_n$. If all $n$th roots of unity do lie in $K$, the action is trivial, and after choosing a primitive root of unity the cocycles are characters into $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$. Thus adjoining an $n$th root of $a$ describes a cyclic extension of degree dividing $n$, and Kummer classes classify the corresponding characters. For $n=2$, this gives the familiar quadratic extensions and the square-class group of a field.

Now let $K$ be a number field and $E/K$ an elliptic curve. The multiplication-by-n morphism is a surjective isogeny on $E(\overline{K})$, with kernel $E[n]\cong (\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}{)}^2$. The Kummer exact sequence of an elliptic curveyieldsExplicitly, choose $Q$ with $nQ=P$ and set $\delta (P{)}_{\sigma }=\sigma Q-Q$. This lies in $E[n]$, satisfies the cocycle identity and is unchanged as a class if $Q$ is replaced by another division point. If it is a coboundary $\sigma T-T$ for $T\in E[n]$, then $Q-T$ is rational over $K$ and $P=n(Q-T)$. Conversely such a rational division point makes the cocycle zero. This proves the injectivity of the Kummer map of an elliptic curve on $E(K)/nE(K)$.

To prove the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem, it remains to prove that this particular cohomological image is finite. The full group $H^1(K,E[n])$ need not be finite, so the injection alone is not enough. Choose a finite set $S$ of finite places containing the bad-reduction places and those dividing $n$. At any other place, the construction in Question 3 works over the local field: reduce $P$, find an $n$-division point over a finite residue extension, lift it by the Hensel lemma, and correct its error by the inverse formal multiplication. Thus $P$ has an $n$-division point over the maximal unramified extension. Choosing that lift locally makes the cocycle zero on inertia. For an arbitrary lift its restriction is a coboundary, so the cohomology class is unramified. Therefore the image lies in first Galois cohomology unramified outside a finite set:We prove the required finiteness of this group. Take a finite Galois extension $L/K$ containing all of $E[n]$ and ${\mu }_n$, and enlarge $S$ to include any remaining ramification of $L/K$. Let $S_L$ be the places above it. The inflation-restriction exact sequence bounds the kernel of restriction to $L$ bya finite group, since both its group of arguments and its group of values are finite. Over $L$ the torsion module is constant and can be identified with ${\mu }_n^2$, so Kummer theory givesRestrictions of our unramified classes remain unramified outside $S_L$. If a Kummer class $[a]$ is unramified at such a place $v$, its $n$th root can be taken in an unramified local extension. The extended valuation still has integer values, and $nv(\sqrt[n]{a})=v(a)$. Hence $v(a)$ is divisible by $n$. Each coordinate therefore lies in the S-unramified power class groupThis group is finite. Indeed, the ideal of $a$ away from $S_L$ is ${\mathfrak{a}}^n$. Sending $[a]$ to $[\mathfrak{a}]$ yields the exact sequenceFor its kernel, a principal $\mathfrak{a}$ lets us divide $a$ by an $n$th power to obtain an $S_L$-unit. For surjectivity, an ideal class killed by $n$ has an $n$th power which is principal away from $S_L$, giving such an $a$. The S-unit group is finitely generated and the ideal class group is finite; hence both end groups are finite, proving finiteness of S-unramified Kummer classes. Restriction has finite image in $L(S_L,n{)}^2$ and finite kernel, so $H_S^1(K,E[n])$ is finite. We concludewhich is the Weak Mordell-Weil theorem and its Kummer-theoretic proof of the weak Mordell-Weil theorem.

This framework also defines the Selmer group of an elliptic curve by imposing that a class in $H^1(K,E[n])$ lie in the local Kummer image at every completion. Its classes are unramified outside a fixed finite set, so the same finiteness proof applies. Its relation to rational points isThe Tate–Shafarevich group here measures the difference between locally soluble torsors and globally soluble ones. Finally, the weak theorem gives finite divisibility quotients; adding the height descent lemma and bounded-height finiteness proves the stronger Mordell-Weil theorem. Those height inputs are additional to the cohomological finiteness just established.