A Non-Archimedean absolute value on a field is a function with exactly for , , and the ultrametric inequality . It is nontrivial if some nonzero element has value different from one. Equivalent absolute values induce the same topology; for nontrivial absolute values this is equivalent to for some .
Here is also a proof of the latter equivalence in the case needed. A positive power plainly preserves the open neighborhoods of zero. Conversely, if the topologies coincide, then if and only if in the first topology, hence if and only if . Choose with . For every , and , whether agrees for the two values. Comparison with all rational numbers therefore identifies the two ratios . Thus with .
Now let be nontrivial and non-Archimedean on . Since and every positive integer is a sum of ones, for every integer. If all nonzero integers had value one, multiplicativity would make the absolute value trivial on all rationals. Hence some integer has value less than one; its prime factorization shows that some prime has .
There cannot be two distinct such primes . A Bezout identity with would giveThus every other prime has value one. Prime factorization of the numerator and denominator of now givesConversely is multiplicative and satisfies the ultrametric inequality, since . Distinct primes give inequivalent values: for the -adic absolute value but for . We have proved the non-Archimedean part of Ostrowski theorem:There is exactly one equivalence class for each prime.
A basis of open sets in the p-adic integers isIndeed this is the set of with , equivalently ; these neighborhoods become arbitrarily small. Reduction identifies with , so each has index .
If a subgroup is open, a neighborhood of zero of the displayed form lies inside . Thus for some , and is finite.
Conversely suppose the abstract index is the finite integer . The quotient is a finite abelian group of order , so Lagrange's theorem gives for every . Write with . Multiplication by the p-adic unit is a bijection of , its inverse being multiplication by . ConsequentlyThe subgroup is a union of open cosets of , and is therefore open. This proves the characterization of open subgroups of the p-adic integers:No prior assumption of closedness is required for the finite-index direction.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.