Let , and . The proposed least-squares estimators satisfy the sum-to-zero constraints because and . Define . Direct summation gives
Now write any other admissible parameters as , , , where . Expanding the ordinary least squares criterion, the cross-products with vanish by the preceding identities. The cross-products between , and vanish by their zero sums. Consequently
Every added term is nonnegative and all vanish only at , . This proves the unique constrained minimum, with
The additive-model residual sum of squares and intercept-only residual sum of squares are therefore
The same orthogonality gives the analysis of variance identity
Fitting factor B alone yields fitted values and residual sum . Fitting A alone gives residual sum . Adding B after A then reduces it to , a reduction of again. The reduction due to B is in either order. This is balanced factorial orthogonality; it generally fails for unequal cell replication.
There are observations. The additive model estimates independent parameters, so the missing degrees of freedom are A: 2, B: 1, residuals: 8. The individual requested residual sums are below.
To check for an interaction, extend the normal linear model to , with each row and column sum of zero. Equivalently, fit the six unrestricted cell means. Its residual sum of squares is the within-cell sum
The interaction adds parameters; the cell-means residual has degrees of freedom. Under the no-interaction null hypothesis and the independent equal-variance normal error model,
The numerator and denominator arise from orthogonal Gaussian projections, proving the exact F-test. Reject for a sufficiently large value. The printed additive analysis of variance table does not supply , so it cannot determine this test statistic numerically; the replicated cell data would do so.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.