Let , , and be the count, claim-size and aggregate probability generating functions. Independence in the aggregate claims model gives
The Panjer claim-count class recurrence can be written . Multiply by and sum to obtain
Using the chain rule in then yields
The coefficient of on the left is , where the term is zero. On the right it is . Rearranging gives the Panjer recursion
The initial value is because all claim sizes are positive: zero total loss occurs exactly when . Only already computed aggregate probabilities occur on the right. The count normalization determines from as well: with and , we have and . The assumed valid count law makes this sum finite.
Finally must be positive. If it were zero, the recurrence would make every zero, contradicting normalization. At the recurrence therefore gives
This proves the sign constraint without assuming any particular count family. The three parts below also provide explicit initial probabilities for the aggregate recursion.
If , then . Applying the count recurrence successively gives for every . Normalization forces
Thus the claim count distribution is a point mass at zero, and the aggregate claims model also has almost surely. In particular the recursion starts at and gives no positive-loss probabilities.
With and , the recurrence is . Iteration gives . Since , normalization gives
Hence the claim count distribution is a Poisson distribution of mean , and the Panjer recursion begins at .
Here , so iteration gives
The negative-binomial series , valid for , normalizes this to
This is the negative binomial distribution counting failures before the th success, with success probability . The convention is specified because a negative-binomial variable is sometimes defined to count trials instead. Its count expected value is , and the Panjer recursion begins at . For this reduces to the failure-count geometric distribution.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.