Assume short-range ferromagnetic exchange and zero external field. In the one-dimensional Ising model, a domain wall costs only , independent of the lengths of the domains it separates. There are order- positions for one wall, so its positional entropy offsets any finite energy cost at nonzero temperature as the system grows. Domain walls consequently have a positive density at every , destroying a uniform spontaneous spin magnetization. Periodic boundaries require an even number of walls, but that constraint does not remove their nonzero thermodynamic-limit density.
The One-dimensional Ising correlation function makes this argument explicit. A bond is broken with probability , and the infinite-chain correlation isThe dominant eigenvalue of the transfer matrix for the one-dimensional Ising model is , so the free energy per spin is analytic for . There is no finite-temperature transition in one dimension; only the zero-temperature limit orders.
In two dimensions a reversed cluster is enclosed by a Peierls contour. A contour of length costs , while the number of such contours surrounding a fixed site grows at most as a polynomial in times : after the initial edge, a nonbacktracking square-lattice walk has at most three choices per step. With plus boundary conditions, flipping the interior of a specified contour yields the Boltzmann suppression . ThereforeFor sufficiently low temperature this bound is below , giving a positive spontaneous magnetization. This is the energy-entropy mechanism of the Peierls argument.
At sufficiently high temperature, the graphical expansion bounds correlations by sums of connecting paths weighted by . The same nonbacktracking count converges geometrically when , giving exponential decay and a disordered phase. Since an ordered low-temperature phase and a disordered high-temperature phase both occur, the two-dimensional model has a finite-temperature phase transition. The argument establishes its existence and the dimensional distinction, not the exact value of its critical temperature.
Write and take . The unit-length constraint prevents an arbitrary multiplicative field rescaling, so the running coupling is found by renormalizing the coefficient of . We compute that coefficient in a slowly rotating planar background, which is enough because symmetry makes the two-derivative stiffness isotropic on the sphere.
Let , and for the remaining constant orthonormal tangent vectors. Parameterize the fast tangent fluctuations byThis satisfies exactly. Put , and choose it locally constant and small compared with the shell momenta. Since and , direct differentiation givesAt quadratic order in the fast fields, the cross term is , whose integral is zero for constant . The term is quartic in the fast fields. Remaining cross terms are cubic and have zero Gaussian expectation; their effects on the two-derivative stiffness start at higher loop order. Field-measure corrections independent of the background contribute normalization terms and do not alter the leading gradient coefficient in this calculation.
The quadratic fast action is . In the shell its connected correlation function is with the momentum delta function understood. Thus , wherewith the limit . Here is the angular measure of the unit -sphere. Averaging the background-gradient coefficient gives the one-loop stiffness of a spherical nonlinear sigma model:The coefficient is , not : the fluctuation tangent to the rotation plane does not reduce the gradient cost, because its contribution cancels between and . All other transverse components do reduce it.
After integrating out the shell, put to restore the cutoff. The constrained field keeps unit norm, so , or at this orderFor , . Therefore the renormalization-group beta function isThe displayed terms are the requested one-loop flow. They are a weak-coupling expansion; the discrete target has no tangent modes and must instead be treated by domain walls, as in the first part.
Set . The one-loop flow is . For and , its physical fixed points areThe zero point attracts small positive couplings, whereas the nonzero point is the separatrix between the low-temperature weak-coupling flow and the strong-coupling regime. This is a perturbative description for small ; extrapolation of its nonzero root to large is not controlled.
At and , the only finite one-loop fixed point is , a double root. Positive flows to strong coupling. For the loop coefficient vanishes: at only is fixed, while at every is fixed in this perturbative spin-wave description. The compact two-component model also admits vortices; their Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition is absent from a calculation retaining only the smooth tangent modes. Thus a zero beta function here does not exclude that transition. The formula should not be interpreted as a continuum result for the discrete Ising target.
For a fixed point , put . Linearizing the renormalization-group flow givesBecause is proportional to temperature at fixed microscopic stiffness, this derivative is the thermal eigenvalue. The thermal eigenvalues of the spherical nonlinear sigma model areThe first value describes the stable zero-temperature ordered fixed point. At the nonzero critical point the thermal perturbation grows as , so the stopping scale gives and to leading order in the expansion. Higher-loop terms change this to .
At the linear eigenvalue is zero, so its sign alone does not decide the flow. For the first nonlinear term is positive. Integrating it givesThe flow reaches order-one coupling at a length logarithm of order , explaining the exponentially large correlation length in a two-dimensional spherical sigma model rather than a finite-temperature power-law critical point in this smooth-field regime. For , , the linear eigenvalue is zero everywhere on the perturbative line and vortex effects require an additional coupling. For , , the sole zero-coupling fixed point has .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.