Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2009 / iii / Paper 66 / 4

The comoving particle horizon is the maximum radial distance a photon could have travelled since the initial Big Bang, expressed in comoving coordinates. It describes possible past causal contact, whereas a cosmological event horizon concerns photons that can reach an observer in the future.

For a radial null geodesic in the FLRW metric, $dr/\sqrt{1-k{r}^2}=cdt/a$. Spatial flatness sets $k=0$, so with $a_0=1$,The given Hubble parameter then supplies $a^{2}H=H_0\sqrt{{\Omega }_{r,0}+{\Omega }_{m,0}a+{\Omega }_{\Lambda ,0}{a}^4}$. Since cosmological redshift obeys $a=(1+z{)}^{-1}$,The corresponding proper horizon at that epoch is $a(z)r_p(z)$.

Well before matter-radiation equality, radiation domination makes the integrand approximately constant:At equality, ${\Omega }_{r,0}{a}_{\mathrm{eq}}^{-4}={\Omega }_{m,0}{a}_{\mathrm{eq}}^{-3}$, so $a_{\mathrm{eq}}\simeq 1/3000$ and ${\Omega }_{r,0}\simeq 10^{-4}$. Extrapolating the radiation-only result gives $r_p(a_{\mathrm{eq}})\simeq 133\mathrm{Mpc}$. This overestimates the horizon because matter is no longer negligible at equality and increases the expansion rate.

Retain both matter and radiation, still neglecting the insignificant early cosmological constant. The particle horizon through radiation-matter equality isThereforeThis is a comoving distance; the proper horizon at equality is approximately $110/3000\mathrm{Mpc}\simeq 37$ kiloparsecs.

For today's horizon, extrapolating matter domination givesThis is an order-of-magnitude estimate: dark energy is significant late, and radiation matters early. Numerical integration of the complete expression with the supplied density parameters and ${\Omega }_{r,0}\simeq 10^{-4}$ givesBoth neglected positive-density terms increase $H$ at fixed $a$ and reduce the horizon relative to the matter-only extrapolation.

The distance modulus gives $m_V-M_V=5{\log }_{10}(d/10\mathrm{pc})$. At the magnitude limit, $m_V-M_V=17-(-21)=38$, soThus the stated sample reaches a typical galaxy to approximately $400$ megaparsecs. This uses the assumed absolute magnitude, neglects the specified spectral correction, and equates luminosity distance, angular diameter distance, and proper distance as permitted. It does not imply completeness for galaxies fainter than the adopted typical luminosity.

The plot uses comoving wavenumber in $\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. Using the inverse comoving particle horizon from part (ii) gives $1/r_{p,\mathrm{eq}}\simeq 9\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. The conventional matter-radiation equality scale is insteadThese are consistent order-one conventions for locating the turnover near $10^{-2}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. The horizon-entry condition is $k/(aH/c)\sim 1$; equating an entire Fourier wavelength $2\pi /k$ to the particle horizon would attach a different numerical factor.

For adiabatic initial conditions, the asymptotic cold-dark-matter power spectrum has $P(k)\propto k^{n_s}T(k{)}^2$, where the scalar spectral index is $n_s\simeq 1$ and $T$ is the cosmological transfer function. Modes below $k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during matter domination and have little relative suppression, giving approximately $P\propto k$. Modes above $k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during radiation domination, when logarithmic growth of matter perturbations during radiation domination is much slower. Their transfer is approximately $T\propto \ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/k^2$, giving $P\propto k^{-3}{\ln }^2(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$ well above equality. This explains the broad turnover; baryon acoustic oscillations add structure, and nonlinear evolution modifies sufficiently small scales.

The comoving distance to the Cosmic microwave background last-scattering surface is of order the present horizon, ${\chi }_{\ast }\sim 1.3\times 10^4\mathrm{Mpc}$. At recombination the particle horizon is much smaller, so replacing ${\chi }_{\ast }$ by today's horizon is adequate for the requested estimate. A transverse Fourier mode projects approximately to angular multipole $\ell \sim k{\chi }_{\ast }$. If an angular feature's width is estimated by $\theta \sim 1/\ell$, the resolution ${\theta }_{\min }\sim 10^{-3}$ givesUsing the common half-wavelength convention $\theta \sim \pi /\ell$ instead gives ${\ell }_{\max }\sim 3000$ and $k_{\max }\sim 0.2$--$0.3\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. These express the same order-of-magnitude resolution estimate with different angular-scale conventions. On the graph, a useful indicative band is therefore from about $10^{-4}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ to order $10^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, potentially a few times $10^{-1}$; it is not a sharp instrumental boundary. The lowest useful multipoles are of order a few, with substantial cosmic variance.

The cosmic microwave background constrains the matter power spectrum indirectly through the primordial spectrum and radiation/matter cosmological transfer functions. Beam resolution, Cosmic microwave background diffusion damping, foreground emission, and projection of three-dimensional fluctuations into angular anisotropy limit the recoverable small-scale information. Resolving a given angle alone does not guarantee a precise matter-spectrum measurement there.

A survey depth $R\sim 400\mathrm{Mpc}$ makes wavelengths substantially larger than its volume poorly measurable. A characteristic inverse depth is $1/R\simeq 2.5\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$; a Fourier wavelength that fits across a dimension $L$ instead requires $k\gtrsim 2\pi /L$. For $L$ between $R$ and $2R$, this is roughly $0.008$--$0.016\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. A limited sky patch can have smaller transverse dimensions, so its survey window function raises the practical minimum in those directions. An indicative useful band for a broad survey is around $10^{-2}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ and above, including scales near equality if its volume is large enough.

There is no upper wavenumber determined by depth alone. Mean separation of observed galaxies, galaxy power spectrum shot noise, angular/redshift resolution, and nonlinear clustering set it. Straightforward linear inference is typically restricted to roughly $k\lesssim 0.1\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ at low redshift, with smaller scales requiring modelling. The magnitude limit does not specify the galaxy comoving number density, so a more precise sampling cutoff cannot be deduced from these data.

The two measurements are complementary. The cosmic microwave background samples a large volume at an early epoch when relevant perturbations are mostly linear, and is free of galaxy bias; its matter-spectrum inference is indirect and depends on projection, cosmological parameters, foregrounds, and cosmic variance. A galaxy survey gives three-dimensional late-time information and can reach smaller scales, but observes biased, discrete tracers: galaxy bias, nonlinear gravitational growth, redshift-space distortions, selection effects, and galaxy power spectrum shot noise must be controlled. Combining both constrains the initial spectrum and its subsequent growth more strongly than either alone, while their overlapping modes test the inferred evolution.