Put , and define . The triangle inequality shows that is Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant one. It vanishes on , and on . Let for a uniform permutation.
If , apply the lower-tail bound proved in part (i):
If , apply its upper-tail bound:
For the desired inequality is simply . Hence in all cases
This uses only the precise one-sided concentration inequality from part (i) and the Hamming distance triangle inequality. The normalization of the distance matters: it counts mismatching coordinates, rather than dividing their number by .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.