The intermediate value theorem states that if is continuous, then every real value between and is attained at some . Here is a proof using completeness of the real numbers. Endpoint values are immediate, so suppose ; reversing the sign of handles the other ordering. LetThe set is nonempty and bounded above. Continuity at puts points to the right of in , while continuity at excludes an entire interval to the left of , so . If , continuity puts some point larger than in , contradicting its supremum. If , continuity excludes in a neighborhood of , contradicting the existence of points of arbitrarily close to its supremum from below. Therefore , proving the theorem.
For the fixed-point assertion, put . This is continuous, with and . If either endpoint value is zero it already gives a fixed point; otherwise the intermediate value theorem gives an interior zero. HenceThe proof needs both continuity and the closed-interval endpoint information; the following counterexamples separate those hypotheses.
No. The continuous function maps into , but throughout the domain. Its only possible fixed point is the excluded endpoint one.
No. The continuous function is a self-map of , but the fixed point equation would require , which is impossible.
No. Define for and . This self-map of is discontinuous at one. Every point smaller than one is sent to a different point, and one is sent to zero, so it has no fixed point.
Yes: a tangential zero and a crossing zero can give exactly two fixed points. One explicit continuous piecewise linear example isAdjacent formulas agree at each junction. Their endpoint values lie in , so linear interpolation proves that the whole image lies in ; also and . On the four pieces, is respectively , , , and . Their only zeros on their respective intervals are and . Thus the complete fixed point set is . Continuity forces at least one zero, but does not force every zero to change sign.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.