The intermediate value theorem states that if is continuous, then every real value between and is attained at some . Here is a proof using completeness of the real numbers. Endpoint values are immediate, so suppose ; reversing the sign of handles the other ordering. LetThe set is nonempty and bounded above. Continuity at puts points to the right of in , while continuity at excludes an entire interval to the left of , so . If , continuity puts some point larger than in , contradicting its supremum. If , continuity excludes in a neighborhood of , contradicting the existence of points of arbitrarily close to its supremum from below. Therefore , proving the theorem.
For the fixed-point assertion, put . This is continuous, with and . If either endpoint value is zero it already gives a fixed point; otherwise the intermediate value theorem gives an interior zero. HenceThe proof needs both continuity and the closed-interval endpoint information; the following counterexamples separate those hypotheses.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.