Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2012 / iii / Paper 13 / 1

Use the usual convention that a variety is an irreducible variety. For a quasi-projective algebraic set $T$, its algebraic dimension is the supremum of the lengths $r$ of strict chainsof nonempty irreducible closed subsets of $T$. It is the maximum of the algebraic dimensions of its irreducible components. On an affine algebraic set, the correspondence between irreducible closed subsets and prime ideals reverses inclusion, so this is the Krull dimension of the coordinate ring. On a quasi-projective algebraic set, it is the supremum of the Krull dimensions of the coordinate rings of its affine open subsets. At a closed point $x$, the Krull dimension of the local ring measures chains through $x$.

Here is a closed-point dimension lemma for affine domains that avoids transcendence degree. Put $A=k[X]$. By Noether normalization, there is a integral extensionThe number of variables is $d$ because integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and $\dim B=d$. For any maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $A$, its contraction $\mathfrak{n}$ to $B$ is a maximal ideal. Since $k$ is an algebraically closed field, $\mathfrak{n}=(z_1-c_1,\dots ,z_d-c_d)$ has height of a prime ideal $d$. The going-down theorem applies because $B$ is an integrally closed domain and $A$ is a integral domain. It lifts a length-$d$ chain below $\mathfrak{n}$ to one below $\mathfrak{m}$. HenceThe opposite inequality follows from $\dim A=d$.

For the nonempty open subset $U$, choose a nonempty principal open subset $D(g)\subset U$ and a closed point $x\in D(g)$. Every prime ideal below ${\mathfrak{m}}_x$ avoids $g$, so the preceding chain survives in the localization $A_g$. Consequently $\dim D(g)\ge d$. Conversely, any chain of irreducible closed subsets in $U$ gives a chain of the same length after taking closures in $X$: intersecting those closures with $U$ recovers the original subsets. Therefore

For the principal hypersurface dimension lemma, let $P$ be a minimal prime ideal over $(f)$. Since $f\ne 0$ in the integral domain $A$, $P\ne (0)$. The Krull principal ideal theorem gives $\mathrm{ht}P=1$. Choose a closed point $x$ on $V(P)$ lying on none of the other finitely many irreducible components of $V(f)$. Such a point exists because those other components cut out proper closed subsets of the irreducible variety $V(P)$, and closed points are dense. Set $R=A_{{\mathfrak{m}}_x}$. Then $\dim R=d$ andWrite $s=\dim R/fR$. Choose a system of parameters ${\bar{y}}_1,\dots ,{\bar{y}}_s$ in $R/fR$ and lift it to $R$. The ideal $(f,y_1,\dots ,y_s)$ has radical equal to the maximal ideal of $R$. The Krull height theorem yields $d\le s+1$. On the other hand, any chain of prime ideals containing $f$ can be extended strictly at the bottom by the zero prime ideal of the integral domain $R$, giving $s\le d-1$. Thus $s=d-1$. Since $R/PR$ is a localization of $A/P$, $\dim A/P\ge d-1$. Extending a chain in $A/P$ by $(0)⊊P$ also gives $\dim A/P\le d-1$. Hence every component has the required dimension:This argument uses Noether normalization, going-down theorem, and the Krull height theorem, never the dimension from the function field theorem. Irreducibility is essential: if the word variety were instead allowed to mean an arbitrary reducible affine algebraic set, neither assertion would hold without extra hypotheses. For example, a disjoint union of an affine plane and an affine line has an open component of smaller algebraic dimension; a function equal to $1$ on the plane and a coordinate on the line has a nonempty zero set of algebraic dimension $0$.

Put $A=k[X]$. There is an explicit isomorphism from the principal open subset $U_f$ to the affine algebraic setIts inverse is projection, and both maps are regular maps. The coordinate ring isby the universal property of localization. Since regular functions on an affine variety are its coordinate ring, this proves the natural $k$-algebra isomorphism

Now $W=D(x)\cup D(y)$. A regular function on $W$ determines one element of the function field $k(x,y)$, and its restrictions belong to $k[x,y{]}_x$ and $k[x,y{]}_y$. Conversely, elements of their intersection glue because they agree on $D(xy)$. ThusIf a reduced fraction has denominator dividing a power of $x$ and also a power of $y$, unique factorization makes its denominator a unit. Therefore puncturing the plane does not change its ring of global regular functions:If $W$ were an affine variety, its inclusion $j:W\hookrightarrow {\mathbb{A}}^2$ would correspond to the identity isomorphism $k[x,y]\to k[W]$. The equivalence between affine varieties and their coordinate rings would make $j$ an isomorphism, contradicting the missing origin. Hence $W$ is not affine. This illustrates regular functions on the punctured affine plane: the coordinate ring alone does not recover a nonaffine variety.

Take the three-dimensional affine quadric coneThe polynomial $xy-zw$ is an irreducible polynomial: as a polynomial in $x$ over $k[y,z,w]$, it is primitive because $y$ and $zw$ are coprime elements of a unique factorization domain, and it is a linear irreducible polynomial over $k(y,z,w)$. Gauss lemma for polynomials then applies. Thus $X$ is an irreducible variety that is an affine variety, of algebraic dimension $3$ by the principal hypersurface dimension lemma in affine space ${\mathbb{A}}^4$.

The coordinate rings of $Y$ and $Z$ are respectively $k[y,w]$ and $k[x,z]$. Both are affine planes, hence irreducible closed subsets of algebraic dimension $2$. Their intersection is precisely the origin. ThereforeThe origin is the singular point of an algebraic variety of this three-dimensional affine quadric cone. The example shows why a smoothness of an algebraic variety hypothesis matters in intersection dimension estimates.