Fix , and let be the union of all connected subsets containing . Their union is connected: a separation of the union would place on one side, and every connected member meeting that side would have to lie entirely there. The other side would be empty. By the defining equivalence relation this union is exactly the connected component of .
The closure of a connected set is connected as well. Indeed, if its closure had a separation into relatively open nonempty pieces, density would make both pieces meet the original set and give a separation of that connected set. Therefore is a connected subset containing , so maximality gives . The reverse inclusion is automatic. Every connected component is connected and closed.
Let and be the connected components of and . First, is connected in the product topology. For each , the connected slice meets the connected slice . Their union over is connected by the common-intersection argument, and is exactly .
Now let be the connected component of in . The coordinate projections are continuous, so their images of are connected and contain and . Maximality therefore gives . Conversely, the connected set contains , so it lies in . . This is connected components of a product space; it requires neither local connectedness nor path connectedness.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.