For , the first time is a stopping time. On , the bounded increments assumption controls the overshoot:
Before that time, . Allowing the possibility , the process
is a nonnegative martingale. Indeed, the stopped martingale in discrete time is a martingale, and the integrable -measurable variable is a constant-in-time martingale. If , nonnegativity follows from . Its expectations are constant and finite, so the Martingale convergence theorem makes converge to a finite value almost surely.
On this proves finite convergence of . Taking the countable union over positive integer , we conclude that converges finitely on the event . Apply the same reasoning to the martingale to obtain finite convergence on .
Outside the event of finite convergence, both the infimum and the supremum of the sequence must therefore be infinite in the respective directions. Removing any finite initial segment cannot change this, because each of its values is finite. Hence
This is the bounded-increment martingale convergence-or-oscillation dichotomy. The term ensures the proof also covers an unbounded integrable initial value.
Let independent Bernoulli random variables have success probabilities , for , and use their natural filtration. Define
Each increment is integrable, finite, and independent of the previous filtration, with expectation
Thus is a martingale. The increments have no common finite bound, since a success produces a jump of size .
Since , the First Borel-Cantelli lemma says that only finitely many successes occur almost surely. Consequently
for all sufficiently large , with the random sum finite almost surely. Therefore almost surely, so neither finite convergence nor two-sided oscillation occurs. This rare-jump martingale divergence example gives probability zero, rather than one, for the union in (i).

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.