For any fixed bin, each ball supplies an independent Bernoulli distribution indicator with success probability . Summing the indicator variables gives
The full occupancy vector has a multinomial distribution, the basic uniform balls-in-bins allocation. Distinct bin counts are not independent when and . To see this, write . For the same ball, if , while indicators from distinct balls are independent. Their covariance is therefore
With no balls the counts are deterministic; with one bin there are no distinct bin pairs. These degenerate cases do not contradict the conclusion.
Express the three counts as sums of indicator variables for , and . The linearity of expectation applies even though the bin counts are dependent. The binomial distribution gives
Thus
The relation checks the sum of these expectations. For , use the direct deterministic occupancies, or the usual binomial convention when .
There are more bins than balls, so the pigeonhole principle forces at least one empty bin. In fact . Consequently
For the expected fraction, substitute into part (b). The elementary exponential limit, obtained by taking logarithms, gives
This is the empty-bin case of the Poisson limit for occupancy fractions, with limiting mean occupancy .
If , every bin contains at most one ball, so the total number of balls is at most . Since , the pigeonhole principle makes that event impossible:
As along these values, and the mean occupancy is . Apply part (b):
Both powers tend to . Hence
The Poisson limit for occupancy fractions interprets the answer as the probability that a Poisson distribution variable with mean is at least two.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.