Work with a probability measure-preserving system, so . Put
The maximal ergodic theorem, also called the maximal ergodic lemma, says that for real ,
No ergodic transformation or invertibility assumption is needed for this maximal ergodic lemma.
Here is a proof of the maximal ergodic lemma. Set and . These are integrable: . Splitting off the first summand gives
On , this implies . Outside the right side is . Consequently
Integrating and using the measure-preserving transformation property gives . Since increases to , the dominated convergence theorem, with dominating function , proves the infinite-supremum assertion of the maximal ergodic lemma.
For example, applying the maximal ergodic lemma to yields the useful maximal bound
Indeed on the latter set , the maximal ergodic lemma gives .
The pointwise ergodic theorem states that for a probability measure-preserving system and ,
where is the invariant sigma-algebra. The conditional expectation is invariant and has integral . If is an ergodic transformation, this conditional expectation is the constant . The assertion applies to real or complex integrable functions; it is the Birkhoff ergodic theorem.
For a nonnegative measurable , if , the pointwise ergodic theorem already proves the required conclusion. For the remaining case, let , . Each is integrable on the probability measure-preserving system. The pointwise ergodic theorem and ergodic transformation property give, on a single set of full measure obtained by a countable intersection,
Since , every such satisfies for all . The monotone convergence theorem gives . Thus the nonnegative ergodic averages with infinite integral tend to , rather than merely having an unbounded subsequence. Combining the two cases,
Nonnegativity is what makes truncation a lower bound. The probability normalization is also essential to the displayed value: for a finite measure of total mass , the corresponding constant is .
The Szemerédi theorem says that for every integer and every , there is such that, for , every with contains a nonconstant arithmetic progression
Equivalently, every subset of the positive integers with positive upper asymptotic density contains arithmetic progressions of every finite length. Length one is immediate.
The Furstenberg multiple recurrence theorem states that for every probability measure-preserving system, every measurable with , and every integer , there is with
Here means a preimage, so invertibility is unnecessary. The Furstenberg multiple recurrence theorem also does not assume an ergodic transformation.
We prove the implication to the finite Szemerédi theorem by constructing the Furstenberg correspondence principle explicitly. Suppose, to the contrary, that for fixed and there are and with , but with no length- arithmetic progression of positive common difference. In the binary full shift , encode as , taking all coordinates outside to be zero. Let be the left shift, , and set
The cylinder set is a clopen set, and . The binary full shift is a compact metric space, so compactness of probability measures on a compact metric space gives a subsequence of these empirical measures with weak convergence of probability measures to a Borel probability measure .
For every continuous on the full shift,
Passing to the weak limit shows that is an invariant measure for the continuous left shift. Thus is a probability measure-preserving system. Since the indicator function of is continuous, .
Apply the Furstenberg multiple recurrence theorem to . For some , the clopen set
has . Its continuous indicator function gives . For large , at least one in the defining empirical measure therefore belongs to . The choice of left shift implies
so lies in . This contradicts the assumed absence of arithmetic progressions and proves the finite Szemerédi theorem. Applying the finite Szemerédi theorem on intervals where an infinite set has density bounded below proves the stated upper asymptotic density formulation.
For multiple recurrence for circle rotations, write and , with normalized Lebesgue measure , which is the Haar measure of the circle group. Fix a measurable with and . If is rational, there is with the identity, and gives an intersection of measure .
For irrational , the pigeonhole principle applied to in equal arcs gives with . In particular there are arbitrarily small nonzero returns to zero for the irrational rotation of the circle.
We also need translation continuity in L1 on the circle. Given a measurable , approximate its indicator function in the L1 norm by a continuous on the circle group. Such approximation follows from regularity of Lebesgue measure, or approximation by finite unions of intervals. Translation invariance and uniform continuity give
where the approximation error is first made arbitrarily small. Equivalently, .
Choose a return time so small modulo one that for each ,
This is possible because multiplication by each fixed is continuous on the circle group and translation continuity in L1 on the circle applies to the finitely many translates. The union bound now gives
This proves the Furstenberg multiple recurrence theorem for every circle rotation with its normalized Lebesgue measure, including both rational and irrational angles.
For an irrational rotation of the circle, let on , and let be any invariant Borel probability measure. For each integer , set . Invariance gives
For , irrationality forces , so the corresponding Fourier coefficient is zero. For it is one. These are exactly the Fourier coefficients of normalized Lebesgue measure . By the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, trigonometric polynomials are uniformly dense in the continuous functions on the circle group; hence and integrate every continuous function equally and are the same Borel probability measure. Since is invariant, the irrational rotation of the circle is uniquely ergodic, with unique measure .
For the irrational skew shift on the two-dimensional torus, write
The map is invertible, with modulo one, and it preserves as allowed in the question. We first prove the ergodic transformation property by the invariant-function characterization of ergodicity.
Let satisfy . Its expansion in the Fourier basis is in . Direct calculation of the Koopman operator gives
Uniqueness of the Fourier coefficients therefore implies
For , the magnitudes of the Fourier coefficients along all distinct indices , , are equal. By the Bessel inequality they are square summable, so every such coefficient must be zero. When , the relation becomes , which forces for . Only remains. Thus every invariant function is constant, and
To prove unique ergodicity, we will establish uniform averages for every continuous function directly. No theorem on unique ergodicity of skew products is needed. Induction on , using the old first coordinate in the second coordinate of , yields
In particular, for a Fourier basis element,
If and , this is a geometric series in , and
uniformly in .
For , we give the finite Van der Corput inequality for finite scalar sequences and its proof. For , extend by zero outside . Fix an integer and set . Every original summand appears times in the identity
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, followed by expansion of the squared window sums, gives
Consequently the Van der Corput inequality for finite scalar sequences is
The finite prefactor is important; the order of limits will be with fixed, followed by .
For the irrational skew shift character sequence above, differencing cancels the quadratic term:
For every fixed , is irrational, so another geometric series estimate gives
uniformly in . With fixed , the Van der Corput inequality for finite scalar sequences therefore implies
Letting proves that the averages of every nonconstant Fourier basis element converge uniformly to zero. The constant character has average one. This establishes uniform equidistribution of an irrational skew shift on all trigonometric polynomials.
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem makes these trigonometric polynomials uniformly dense in . If approximates a continuous with , then
Taking and then proves uniform convergence to for every continuous .
Finally, if is any invariant Borel probability measure for the irrational skew shift, invariance and this uniform convergence give
Thus , since continuous functions determine Borel probability measures on a compact metric space. We conclude
The uniform-average proof also shows that every starting point has the same limiting continuous-function averages, a stronger conclusion than the almost-everywhere assertion provided by the pointwise ergodic theorem.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.